Make concrete a required tech for artillery

Ideas that are too old (too many things have changed since) and ones which won't be implemented for certain reasons or if there are obviously better suggestions.

Moderator: ickputzdirwech

Post Reply
Copy link
blazespinnaker
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:45 pm
Contact:
Contact blazespinnaker

Make concrete a required tech for artillery

Post by blazespinnaker »

Why: Artillery turret requires concrete. Not sure if there are other techs like this.

cheers
OptimaUPS Mod, pm for info.
Top
User avatar
bormand
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 9:59 am
Contact:
Contact bormand

Re: Make concrete a required tech for artillery

Post by bormand »

Well, you can build and use Artillery Wagon, so concrete is a soft requirement, not a hard one.
Top
Koub
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 8047
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:54 am
Contact:
Contact Koub

Re: Make concrete a required tech for artillery

Post by Koub »

Just so that you know, in the past, the devs have always said they weren't planning to make a "dependency complete" tech tree, only ensure science pack dependency is accurate. :
viewtopic.php?p=211682#p211682
viewtopic.php?p=484843#p484843
viewtopic.php?p=401353#p401353
viewtopic.php?p=339579#p339579
viewtopic.php?p=263597#p263597
viewtopic.php?p=294897#p294897
viewtopic.php?p=268923#p268923
viewtopic.php?p=268546#p268546
viewtopic.php?p=261600#p261600
I know all these were replies on "bug report" threads, but they still are relevant to the suggestion.
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
Top
User avatar
ssilk
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 12889
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:35 pm
Contact:
Contact ssilk

Re: Make concrete a required tech for artillery

Post by ssilk »

so we can move this to not implement.
Cool suggestion: Eatable MOUSE-pointers.
Have you used the Advanced Search today?
Need help, question? FAQ - Wiki - Forum help
I still like small signatures...
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Outdated/Not implemented”