data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc693/fc693a720eb3815bfefbcf4ec06dd67853be7bc1" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5427d/5427d7dccbbf69361adbf892943492bee13057e7" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16c25/16c2507b762a1439da12de81ed5f5d90c858d5eb" alt="Image"
I think the car and tank storage should be decreased by a bit.
Has science gone too far?emilygrace wrote:[Koub] Deleted post : it was a spambot advertising.
A trailer might not be feasible given the current programming and how clunky the driving tends to be.bobucles wrote:That sort of inventory problem can be addressed with a "trailer", I.E. a cargo car for the car. More cargo space comes at the cost of mobility.
It should be way more generalssilk wrote:Some similar and more general discussion: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=7401&hilit=car+inventory Balancing of Capacities of Containers
Why? In 0.12 you would just need to up the time at each station and in 0.13 the "when empty" or "when full" train conditions will accommodate any cargo capacity.bobucles wrote:High capacity trains are more difficult to load and unload in a reasonable manner.