Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing

Don't know how to use a machine? Looking for efficient setups? Stuck in a mission?
fbsr
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2024 4:18 am
Contact:

Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing

Post by fbsr »

Looking for feedback on the rail signals, mainly where 3 segments fuse into one. This is quite hard.
- Train size: 1 locomotive + 4 wagons
- Right sized signals

here's the blueprint:
https://factoriobin.com/post/mp5215
07-21-2026, 18-00-54.png
07-21-2026, 18-00-54.png (1.68 MiB) Viewed 325 times
Fletch
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu May 08, 2025 10:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing

Post by Fletch »

I generally follow the golden rule: "chain signals before intersections, regular signals after intersections".

Looking in your screenshot...

Top-left area: missing a regular signal on the exit of the bottom track (you have it on the top track correctly).
Top-right area: 2 of the 3 exit points are using chain signals instead of regular signals. 1 of 3 is already correct. -- but this is highly dependent on whether a train can fit in there without deadlocking the loop somehow.
Bottom-left area: essentially same problem as the top-right. 1 of the 3 has regular signal (good), 2 of the 3 have chain-signal instead (not so good) -- also highly dependent on whether a train can fit. Could potentially widen this to ensure a train can fit.
Bottom-right area: that one is correct already (chain signals in, regular signals out).

Nice design, BTW !
Loewchen
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 10922
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing

Post by Loewchen »

You can replace every single chain signal with a regular signal as there are no crossings in the whole thing. Some of the signals on the four forks on the far left and right could be removed as they follow very close but that does not hurt anything.
Placing additional signals on the off and on ramps of the circle will significantly reduce delay:
new signals
jdrexler75
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2020 5:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing

Post by jdrexler75 »

One thing that isn't about signals as such, but what I've learned to do for intersections that contain roundabouts like this: put each turnout ahead of the corresponding merging track: instead of both tracks being able to reach the turnout, only the one already on the roundabout can get there.

This way trains won't be able to path through the roundabout without going around the whole circle, which usually is much longer and more expensive than whatever minor obstacle they're trying to avoid through the roundabout. It keeps the roundabout clear for those trains that actually need to use it.
Screenshot_20260722_223613r.png
Screenshot_20260722_223613r.png (1.87 MiB) Viewed 196 times
You won't be able to place a signal in that section of crossing track, but it's not helpful there anyway.
Jap2.0
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 2590
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing

Post by Jap2.0 »

Loewchen wrote: Wed Jul 22, 2026 7:52 pm You can replace every single chain signal with a regular signal as there are no crossings in the whole thing.
Except entering and in the roundabout, right?
There are 10 types of people: those who get this joke and those who don't.
Loewchen
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 10922
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing

Post by Loewchen »

Jap2.0 wrote: Thu Jul 23, 2026 12:05 am
Loewchen wrote: Wed Jul 22, 2026 7:52 pm You can replace every single chain signal with a regular signal as there are no crossings in the whole thing.
Except entering and in the roundabout, right?
Yeah, if you really want to make sure that no train that cannot exit the circle may hinder a train that could. The problem with using chain signals in a circle is though, that they force a very big gap between trains because the chain is so long. I would expect that gap to be worse for throughput than the potential hindrance when an exit is blocked, especially since such a blockage is avoidable imo.
mmmPI
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 5202
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing

Post by mmmPI »

Maybe it's hard because there isn't a single way to do it, to me the picture in the OP is missing regular signal on the inner lane of the vertical exit ways, that's what makes me tick the most, the picture show train exiting the junction after a chain signal. But it would not change the functionning, just makes it more obvious where the junction ends and increase throughput by reducing distance between 2 trains.

As hinted , one risk with roundabout is to have trains deadlocking in them, when each block is occupied by a train, the use of chain signals or merger trick can avoid that but it can increase the distance between successive trains and hinder throughput. In that regard the initial blueprint appears "safe" to me.

But there are things that are looking like a rule applied with a bit too much rigidity, like those yellow blocks on the horizontal outer exit. There is the 3=>1 merger, where 3 chain signal guards a tiny block limited by a regular signal. Here typically, you can replace the 3 chain signals by regular signals, and remove the regular one after the merge.
Check out my latest mod ! It's noisy !
Post Reply

Return to “Gameplay Help”