Looking for feedback on the rail signals, mainly where 3 segments fuse into one. This is quite hard.
- Train size: 1 locomotive + 4 wagons
- Right sized signals
here's the blueprint:
https://factoriobin.com/post/mp5215
Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing
Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing
I generally follow the golden rule: "chain signals before intersections, regular signals after intersections".
Looking in your screenshot...
Top-left area: missing a regular signal on the exit of the bottom track (you have it on the top track correctly).
Top-right area: 2 of the 3 exit points are using chain signals instead of regular signals. 1 of 3 is already correct. -- but this is highly dependent on whether a train can fit in there without deadlocking the loop somehow.
Bottom-left area: essentially same problem as the top-right. 1 of the 3 has regular signal (good), 2 of the 3 have chain-signal instead (not so good) -- also highly dependent on whether a train can fit. Could potentially widen this to ensure a train can fit.
Bottom-right area: that one is correct already (chain signals in, regular signals out).
Nice design, BTW !
Looking in your screenshot...
Top-left area: missing a regular signal on the exit of the bottom track (you have it on the top track correctly).
Top-right area: 2 of the 3 exit points are using chain signals instead of regular signals. 1 of 3 is already correct. -- but this is highly dependent on whether a train can fit in there without deadlocking the loop somehow.
Bottom-left area: essentially same problem as the top-right. 1 of the 3 has regular signal (good), 2 of the 3 have chain-signal instead (not so good) -- also highly dependent on whether a train can fit. Could potentially widen this to ensure a train can fit.
Bottom-right area: that one is correct already (chain signals in, regular signals out).
Nice design, BTW !
Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing
You can replace every single chain signal with a regular signal as there are no crossings in the whole thing. Some of the signals on the four forks on the far left and right could be removed as they follow very close but that does not hurt anything.
Placing additional signals on the off and on ramps of the circle will significantly reduce delay:
Placing additional signals on the off and on ramps of the circle will significantly reduce delay:
new signals
-
jdrexler75
- Fast Inserter

- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2020 5:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing
One thing that isn't about signals as such, but what I've learned to do for intersections that contain roundabouts like this: put each turnout ahead of the corresponding merging track: instead of both tracks being able to reach the turnout, only the one already on the roundabout can get there.
This way trains won't be able to path through the roundabout without going around the whole circle, which usually is much longer and more expensive than whatever minor obstacle they're trying to avoid through the roundabout. It keeps the roundabout clear for those trains that actually need to use it. You won't be able to place a signal in that section of crossing track, but it's not helpful there anyway.
This way trains won't be able to path through the roundabout without going around the whole circle, which usually is much longer and more expensive than whatever minor obstacle they're trying to avoid through the roundabout. It keeps the roundabout clear for those trains that actually need to use it. You won't be able to place a signal in that section of crossing track, but it's not helpful there anyway.
Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing
Except entering and in the roundabout, right?Loewchen wrote: Wed Jul 22, 2026 7:52 pm You can replace every single chain signal with a regular signal as there are no crossings in the whole thing.
There are 10 types of people: those who get this joke and those who don't.
Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing
Yeah, if you really want to make sure that no train that cannot exit the circle may hinder a train that could. The problem with using chain signals in a circle is though, that they force a very big gap between trains because the chain is so long. I would expect that gap to be worse for throughput than the potential hindrance when an exit is blocked, especially since such a blockage is avoidable imo.
Re: Help on rail signals on this 73 TPM crossing
Maybe it's hard because there isn't a single way to do it, to me the picture in the OP is missing regular signal on the inner lane of the vertical exit ways, that's what makes me tick the most, the picture show train exiting the junction after a chain signal. But it would not change the functionning, just makes it more obvious where the junction ends and increase throughput by reducing distance between 2 trains.
As hinted , one risk with roundabout is to have trains deadlocking in them, when each block is occupied by a train, the use of chain signals or merger trick can avoid that but it can increase the distance between successive trains and hinder throughput. In that regard the initial blueprint appears "safe" to me.
But there are things that are looking like a rule applied with a bit too much rigidity, like those yellow blocks on the horizontal outer exit. There is the 3=>1 merger, where 3 chain signal guards a tiny block limited by a regular signal. Here typically, you can replace the 3 chain signals by regular signals, and remove the regular one after the merge.
As hinted , one risk with roundabout is to have trains deadlocking in them, when each block is occupied by a train, the use of chain signals or merger trick can avoid that but it can increase the distance between successive trains and hinder throughput. In that regard the initial blueprint appears "safe" to me.
But there are things that are looking like a rule applied with a bit too much rigidity, like those yellow blocks on the horizontal outer exit. There is the 3=>1 merger, where 3 chain signal guards a tiny block limited by a regular signal. Here typically, you can replace the 3 chain signals by regular signals, and remove the regular one after the merge.
Check out my latest mod ! It's noisy !


