Smallest possible Kovarex?

Circuit-free solutions of basic factory-design to achieve optimal item-throughput.
Involving: Belts (balancers, crossings), Inserters, Chests, Furnaces, Assembling Devices ...
Optimized production chains. Compact design.
Please provide blueprints!
Forum rules
Circuit-free solutions of basic factory-design to achieve optimal item-throughput
royce3
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 8:31 pm
Contact:

Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by royce3 »

I came up with this design a few years ago and I have been using it ever since. It's time to share with whoever wants it. I think it might be a contender for the smallest possible kovarex design. Feed both kinds of uranium in on the left and your extra 235 comes out on the right. A benefit of this design is it's very easy to elongate the transport belts and insert some beacons in there. Also, because input comes in on the left and output on the right, you can chain them together, you just have to add more 238 to each one.



03-16-2026, 19-41-02.png
03-16-2026, 19-41-02.png (441.84 KiB) Viewed 337 times

Here's a low tech variant running in my current game:
03-16-2026, 19-44-27.png
03-16-2026, 19-44-27.png (1.04 MiB) Viewed 337 times

Here's a version of the blueprint stretched out with beacons. I haven't figured out how to get the last beacon in there, but I'm not really motivated to try.



03-16-2026, 19-59-35.png
03-16-2026, 19-59-35.png (1009.36 KiB) Viewed 337 times
royce3
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 8:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by royce3 »

I stretched the beacon version a little too far. Easy fix. (I've never used this beaconed blueprint, I built it just now to prove if it really was that easy to modify it for beacons and it was.)

Loewchen
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 10691
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by Loewchen »

Might still not be the smallest setup using belts:
grafik.png
grafik.png (413.22 KiB) Viewed 309 times
quyxkh
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1053
Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 9:01 am
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by quyxkh »

Take the filter off the '235 loader, replace the '238 loader with an underground exit, the back '238 unloader fills, that saves the side lane.
Loewchen
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 10691
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by Loewchen »

quyxkh wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 2:19 pm Take the filter off the '235 loader, replace the '238 loader with an underground exit, the back '238 unloader fills, that saves the side lane.
I did not want to miss some 235 without the input filter, but practicality is not really the goal here anyway.
inefficient
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2025 2:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by inefficient »

I have this one:



I think thats the smallest possible, got it from the forum I think, you dont need the beacons and can tear the units apart, this is just a small module that is balanced, ie it makes enough uranium to fuel the kovarex.
03-16-2026, 20-39-10.png
03-16-2026, 20-39-10.png (671.09 KiB) Viewed 193 times
quyxkh
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1053
Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 9:01 am
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by quyxkh »

Really, though, I think you can start with the one on the left here and extend to the row as desired:
pic
royce3
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 8:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by royce3 »

Loewchen wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 12:55 pm Might still not be the smallest setup using belts:
grafik.png
I like this, but it isn't perfect. It will backlog on 238 and stop producing 235.
royce3
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 8:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by royce3 »

quyxkh wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 2:19 pm Take the filter off the '235 loader, replace the '238 loader with an underground exit, the back '238 unloader fills, that saves the side lane.
I don't like using unconnected undergrounds because I have a habit of accidentally connecting to them when building something else nearby and causing a huge mess.
royce3
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 8:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by royce3 »

inefficient wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 8:38 pm I have this one:



I think thats the smallest possible, got it from the forum I think, you dont need the beacons and can tear the units apart, this is just a small module that is balanced, ie it makes enough uranium to fuel the kovarex.

03-16-2026, 20-39-10.png
I haven't seen something like this before and it makes me think, but there's a couple problems with this design. Most importantly it loses 235 on top that it doesn't recapture. You only want excess 235 to leave or it will shutdown prematurely. I think there's probably issues with 238 too, but I stopped analyzing once I saw the problem with 235.
royce3
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 8:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Smallest possible Kovarex?

Post by royce3 »

quyxkh wrote: Mon Mar 16, 2026 10:45 pm Really, though, I think you can start with the one on the left here and extend to the row as desired:
pic
My first thought in seeing your design is that I do the same thing with recipes on Gleba that consume their own outputs like nutrients and bacteria. If there's one flaw with my design, it's that you wait a long time for the 235 to loop around which is agonizing when first starting to run. I could use this to redesign mine to go faster, even if it takes up a little more space it will be a win. I also think that incoporating this into my design will allow me to fit the max # of beacons which is a huge win.

All that said, your design is incomplete. It will backlog on an excess of 238 and it mixes 238 into the output. Those problems are easy to fix but it will make your design bigger. It will also let some 235 slip past that aren't excess and could shut down the process until another comes in naturally.
Post Reply

Return to “Mechanical Throughput Magic (circuit-free)”