Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Regular reports on Factorio development.
Ext3h
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 12:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Ext3h »

Just checked, the video already IS 60fps. So this is already just as bad as it would appear ingame. 30 items per lane and second. So at 60fps, there is no sense of direction at all.

And for anyone not achieving a fixed 60fps, this would actually be much worse.

The only sane way to resolve this, would to DOUBLE the SPACING on the green belt or to properly implement MOTION BLUR in addition to that coloration variation.
Last edited by Ext3h on Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
NotRexButCaesar
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:47 am
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by NotRexButCaesar »

Is it just me or does the second to last animation have two states? It seems to move some time and stay still some time. Someone else mentioned that lag would make the animation worse, but I do not think so: as the game lags, the belt speed would also decrease, whereas these belts move at full speed but have fewer frames.

Other than that, I personally have no problems with the item graphics themselves, but I am a bit irritated by the underground entrance being too small.
Last edited by NotRexButCaesar on Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
—Crevez, chiens, si vous n'étes pas contents!
Ext3h
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 12:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Ext3h »

NotRexButCaesar wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:20 pm Is it just me or does the second to last animation have two states? It seems to move half the time and stay still half the time.
No, you are correct. You need at least 3 distinct frames in a loop to form a sense of motion. This one moves all the items 50% of their width (including the negative padding) per frame, so everything repeats every second frame.

It would need either to INCREASE the padding or DECREASE the speed for the visual to keep working.
EustaceCS
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 5:41 am
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by EustaceCS »

This FF issue is hotter than my last ex-gf.
Kyralessa
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 5:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Kyralessa »

General Shrooms wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 2:59 pm Bulk inserters move items in stacks and stack inserters move items in bulk. This update will make the game unplayable
:lol:

It's true, though, the names are backwards. If this change is made, then a stack inserter should become the one that...stacks.
ChefOfRamen
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by ChefOfRamen »

How will this work with items that stack to 10, like low-density structures?

Definite "yes" to big mining drills outputting stacks, though. That makes them a bit more than just power creep. However, this makes me kinda want quality chests and cargo wagons now, since a steel chest of ore can now be depleted in less than a minute with one inserter.
Kadet123
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:56 am
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Kadet123 »

I like the bulk inserter addition. But the new belt tier seems redundant to me, since the bulk inserter tech already increases belt capacity 4x, whereas the belt tier improvement is a 1.33x increase. Sure, we could have both, but it seems like two hands trying to scratch the same itch.

I especially like that long inserters can do filtering now too, and all of them can.

To help colorblind people, maybe consider giving different feet (or hands) to different tiers of inserters. Burners, yellows, and reds can have the traditional 3-foot/tripod base. Stack inserters can have a 4-foot base in a + pattern, bulk inserters can have a 4-foot base in a x pattern.

On the bulk inserter, what happens with items whose stack size is less than the bulk inserter hand size? For example, low density structures. I assume the bulk inserters will only pick up a stack (10 items) instead of a full hand (16 items). If that's true, when it drops them on a belt (which caps at 4 items per stack), I assume its going to put items on the belt in a 4-4-2 pattern (leaving incomplete stacks). I'm fine with that, just curious. Or does it still pick up a full hand size of 16, and place them in 4-4-4-4 on the belt?
Kadet123
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:56 am
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Kadet123 »

ChefOfRamen wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:35 pm How will this work with items that stack to 10, like low-density structures?
Lol, I was just typing the same question.
mmmPI
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 3629
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by mmmPI »

Ext3h wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:24 pm
NotRexButCaesar wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:20 pm Is it just me or does the second to last animation have two states? It seems to move half the time and stay still half the time.
No, you are correct. You need at least 3 distinct frames in a loop to form a sense of motion. This one moves all the items 50% of their width (including the negative padding) per frame, so everything repeats every second frame.

It would need either to INCREASE the padding or DECREASE the speed for the visual to keep working.
That's why i'm curious to see how the "color randomization" looks in game, because i suppose the mp4 has less color than in game, and i suppose the "color randomization" is a very tiny offset in either HUE or brightness to each items, enabling the brain to inconsciously track the individual item, instead of risking to fall into the optical illusion of seeing them going backward or forward, to me it works on the mp4, it's "clear" which way are going the item.
User avatar
Philip017
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 360
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Philip017 »

the flickering in this shot of the belts may make a few people with some medical conditions ill

https://cdn.factorio.com/assets/blog-sy ... ulk-06.mp4

this being the final post of the belts moving at 60 items/sec

i have used mods previously to make the express belts run at 60 items/sec and not been bothered at all by the appearance, however this one did.
Ext3h
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 12:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Ext3h »

mmmPI wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:42 pm
Ext3h wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:24 pm
NotRexButCaesar wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:20 pm Is it just me or does the second to last animation have two states? It seems to move half the time and stay still half the time.
No, you are correct. You need at least 3 distinct frames in a loop to form a sense of motion. This one moves all the items 50% of their width (including the negative padding) per frame, so everything repeats every second frame.

It would need either to INCREASE the padding or DECREASE the speed for the visual to keep working.
That's why i'm curious to see how the "color randomization" looks in game, because i suppose the mp4 has less color than in game, and i suppose the "color randomization" is a very tiny offset in either HUE or brightness to each items, enabling the brain to inconsciously track the individual item, instead of risking to fall into the optical illusion of seeing them going backward or forward, to me it works on the mp4, it's "clear" which way are going the item.
Only works when zoomed out. Because it's not just enough to make the item "traceable", you also MUST remove the high frequency feature of the item in motion by explicitly blurring it in the direction of movement for this to work. You have to blur it to about twice its size in the direction of movement.
gorbag
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by gorbag »

Wait a second: what about inertia? Flinging stacks around hairpin corners should cause topples.
User avatar
GregoriusT
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by GregoriusT »

I just remembered a previous FFF about Underground Belts not being distinguishable in blueprints, and this new olive color of the highest Tier Belts is insanely close to the yellow of first Tier Belts to the point that even with normal 100% color vision it can be difficult to distinguish those two colors at times. I highly suggest choosing a color that is sufficiently different from the Yellow, Red and Blue that already exist. Sadly the little bit ugly "Uranium Green" and "Cheaty Purple" that most Mods use for highest Tier Belts already, are some of the very few colors that are different enough to be distinguishable in this context.

On the subject of color randomization on displays, I personally have my display as dark as possible to not strain my eyes, so certain things like weird movement are showing very bad ripple effects, worse than lack of vsync, like that last video did somehow.
Don't underestimate Landmines!
Biters bite, Spitters spit, Spawners spawn and Worms... worm? - No, they throw their vomit! They even wind up to directly hurl it at you! friggin Hurlers...
Kadet123
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:56 am
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Kadet123 »

Kadet123 wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:38 pm I like the bulk inserter addition. But the new belt tier seems redundant to me, since the bulk inserter tech already increases belt capacity 4x, whereas the belt tier improvement is a 1.33x increase. Sure, we could have both, but it seems like two hands trying to scratch the same itch.

I especially like that long inserters can do filtering now too, and all of them can.

To help colorblind people, maybe consider giving different feet (or hands) to different tiers of inserters. Burners, yellows, and reds can have the traditional 3-foot/tripod base. Stack inserters can have a 4-foot base in a + pattern, bulk inserters can have a 4-foot base in a x pattern.

On the bulk inserter, what happens with items whose stack size is less than the bulk inserter hand size? For example, low density structures. I assume the bulk inserters will only pick up a stack (10 items) instead of a full hand (16 items). If that's true, when it drops them on a belt (which caps at 4 items per stack), I assume its going to put items on the belt in a 4-4-2 pattern (leaving incomplete stacks). I'm fine with that, just curious. Or does it still pick up a full hand size of 16, and place them in 4-4-4-4 on the belt?
ChefOfRamen wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:35 pm How will this work with items that stack to 10, like low-density structures?
Thinking about this more, I assume setting the bulk inserter's hand size to 8 instead of 16 would prevent incomplete stacks from getting on the belt, it would make 2 4-item stacks.
zhonbi
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 6:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by zhonbi »

This FFF sure is quite stacked 8-)

Not quite sure how I feel about the change, but I'm sure I'll grow accustomed to it. Seeing different stack sizes on a belt looks bizarre, but that shouldn't happen often, only when they're being consumed by inputs. I think the mock-up graphic had me worried, but that isn't the final display.

On the bright side, our belt throughput has gone through the roof now, 60 items * 4 stack-size = 240 items/s per belt. I imagine most of the player-base won't even fully utilize a single one of these, let alone multi lanes for a mega-base.
Also appreciated that you removed the filter inserters (from 2.0). I have maybe used a handful of purple inserters in my entire 2k hour career. If the change goes well, I can image you removing them in vanilla as well, and leaving the Bulk inserters as 2.0 content.

If I had one criticism, the green underground belts doesn't look great. It looks...sickly? Not a flattering color, and it's hard to differentiate it from yellow undergrounds. Pale green & yellow are very close on the light spectrum. Making it a deeper green might be a good change.
Panzerknacker
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 5:27 am
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Panzerknacker »

Cool stuff tbh, BUT. Why was it really needed to remove filter inserters? Because tbh, I don't like every simple inserter to have the filtering capability (and included GUI complexity) from the beginning, this could be overwhelming for new players (feature creep). Also, I always thought good factory designs tried to avoid the need for filter inserters, it always felt a bit as a 'hack' to me. Having this ability now default on every simple inserter kinda feels like trivalizing stuff like design of belt network and splitter filters.

Maybe at least lock the filtering capability behind a expensive research which is then also a pre-req for the Bulk inserter.
User avatar
gangan
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 6:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by gangan »

Would it be possible to add an option to deactivate the visual movement of belts? Just of the belt itself, might look wired as the items would glide on a "standing" belt, but I already have trouble getting motion sickness when building large belt systems. Now looking at the stacked belts and the new tier of belts gets me worried 😅🤢
(Oh, same concept but different entity, please add an option to stop the flashing of "no power" indicators, e.g. make them constant or just hide them.^^)
Shuisman
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2020 12:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by Shuisman »

I feel weird that we now have 3 concept of 'stacks': Maybe rethink some of this naming. I guess for veterans there is no issue, but for new players this must be utterly confusing…
laethos
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2021 1:30 am
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by laethos »

I'm enjoying the new vertical scaling options and updates in this FF.

It bothers me that items have no problem staying on the fastest belt. What if the new belt was too fast for inserters to interact with, necessitating loaders instead? Then you could have a covered beltway with guides around turns. That could improve the look and feel and provide an interesting logistics challenge by being limited to loaders. Splitters + loaders would become essential for directing items into machines or onto the belt.

A separate idea: if the belt's base was encased to protect the high speed rollers and bearings, it would allow for side-displayed arrows. This might improve the look over arrows on the belt surface?

Ok last thought: what about a dual-layer belt with surface rollers that grip and speed up items, while the belt itself moves at a slower pace? I imagine this was already considered. I wonder if it would look cool?

I'm so excited about the new changes! I'm about 3000 hours in and still having fun.
Last edited by laethos on Fri Jan 12, 2024 5:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.
laethos
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2021 1:30 am
Contact:

Re: Friday Facts #393 - Putting things on top of other things

Post by laethos »

gangan wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 5:13 pm (Oh, same concept but different entity, please add an option to stop the flashing of "no power" indicators, e.g. make them constant or just hide them.^^)
These two mods combine to completely solve the flashing power icon annoyance. They have become essential for me in every play through:

No Power Icons - https://mods.factorio.com/mod/No_Power_Icons
Bottleneck Lite - https://mods.factorio.com/mod/BottleneckLite

The factory looks nicer overall and you can tell at a glance if there is an issue.
Post Reply

Return to “News”