Friday Facts #375 - Quality
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
sup'
i don't like the names of each rarity levels. Normal, Uncommon, Rare, Epic, Legendary are too common, if you could find new names this could be very cool.
i don't like the names of each rarity levels. Normal, Uncommon, Rare, Epic, Legendary are too common, if you could find new names this could be very cool.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
I agree "bad but optional" is bad marketing for anything. They should focus on how this lets us have upgraded buildings without N*M recipes, which would be too spammy and couldn't happen. The system lets us have a greater variety of upgrades than would be possible otherwise.
And yes there are N*M item types that could take inventory slots, but there will be logistic rules to send them where they belong, so this doesn't happen. With separate recipes, we would need O(N*M) logistic rules; with quality it is simpler.
If they want to use the "optional" line, they can say that putting it in a corner of a mall vs. trying to spread it around is an option. Doing it early vs. later is an option.
And yes there are N*M item types that could take inventory slots, but there will be logistic rules to send them where they belong, so this doesn't happen. With separate recipes, we would need O(N*M) logistic rules; with quality it is simpler.
If they want to use the "optional" line, they can say that putting it in a corner of a mall vs. trying to spread it around is an option. Doing it early vs. later is an option.
Last edited by morsk on Sat Sep 09, 2023 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
Man, what a difference a community makes. XD
I've read through the responses on Steam, and here and in the forums, and it's crazy how night and day it is.
Here on the forums it's mostly "This is interesting", "Here's how I think this could be improved", "I'm not excited about this but I think it could be better".
Meanwhile over on Steam it's "This is awful, how dare you ruin the game", "I want a refund if you implement this", "why do the devs suck so much OMG?!"
XD
Personally my first thought, which I haven't seen anyone else mention, is that this system reminds me of how processors are made IRL. Which makes me wonder if the system maybe shouldn't be reversed: Instead of just creating a base item and sometimes getting higher quality ones, what if you selected a "target quality" and then had a chance, depending on modules, for the crafting to fail or produce lower quality items?
That would almost exactly mirror how processor production works IRL and I think feel slightly less RNG for the player.
I've read through the responses on Steam, and here and in the forums, and it's crazy how night and day it is.
Here on the forums it's mostly "This is interesting", "Here's how I think this could be improved", "I'm not excited about this but I think it could be better".
Meanwhile over on Steam it's "This is awful, how dare you ruin the game", "I want a refund if you implement this", "why do the devs suck so much OMG?!"
XD
Personally my first thought, which I haven't seen anyone else mention, is that this system reminds me of how processors are made IRL. Which makes me wonder if the system maybe shouldn't be reversed: Instead of just creating a base item and sometimes getting higher quality ones, what if you selected a "target quality" and then had a chance, depending on modules, for the crafting to fail or produce lower quality items?
That would almost exactly mirror how processor production works IRL and I think feel slightly less RNG for the player.
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him." - Mark Twain
"True friends stab you in the front." - Oscar Wilde
"True friends stab you in the front." - Oscar Wilde
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
Yeah it's pretty mind boggling that this isn't the way to go. Things shouldn't be as complex as some of the big overhaul mods, but I long wanted some new raw materials. Titanium or aluminum, or something similar. Maybe require some advanced type of ore processing and/or smelting only for that. Quality can come from using gear wheels from a better metal. Not some weird new attribute.Oscar wrote: βSat Sep 09, 2023 9:13 am my suggestion for the developer is this, why not seamlessly combine the quality feature with what space travel and extraterrestrial colonisation would bring? New materials from outerspace and other planets could lead to new ingredients that once further processed with existing product will improve its quality. This way the whole quality thing will feel more natural and it is another way to lure players to explore space and control the overall pace of the game: seamless integration of the base game with a space game!
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
Steam is dominated by hate-followers who try to get the first reply to a post, so they can get forum icons for being annoying on purpose. The culture is honed in the forums of unreleased games, where it's far worse than this, and spills over into everything else.
It's not only devs who get targeted. I will try to get snarky replies in early if someone makes a thread I think is stupid, and so does everyone else basically, because if we don't do it someone else will. The place is cancer.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
I've read trough this entire thread and there's plenty of people here that do not like this, so I think you're misrepresentation the situation.MaxAstro wrote: βSat Sep 09, 2023 1:26 pm Man, what a difference a community makes. XD
I've read through the responses on Steam, and here and in the forums, and it's crazy how night and day it is.
Here on the forums it's mostly "This is interesting", "Here's how I think this could be improved", "I'm not excited about this but I think it could be better".
Meanwhile over on Steam it's "This is awful, how dare you ruin the game", "I want a refund if you implement this", "why do the devs suck so much OMG?!"
XD
Personally my first thought, which I haven't seen anyone else mention, is that this system reminds me of how processors are made IRL. Which makes me wonder if the system maybe shouldn't be reversed: Instead of just creating a base item and sometimes getting higher quality ones, what if you selected a "target quality" and then had a chance, depending on modules, for the crafting to fail or produce lower quality items?
That would almost exactly mirror how processor production works IRL and I think feel slightly less RNG for the player.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
This fits Factorio pasta universe better :
- goodo
- neato
- perfecto
- besto
- ultimo
Sorry...
- goodo
- neato
- perfecto
- besto
- ultimo
Sorry...
-
- Long Handed Inserter
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
I have no problem with people voicing their discontent, I just wonder about some of the underlying reasons.
Refinement and RNG has been in Factorio and in the most popular mods for ages so the reason "it's not very Factorio" doesn't really fly.
Same with "so RNG much gacha" since these things just turn to ratios with higher quantities, also qualities can be forced by providing the
right quality source products. So either it's a misunderstand of the FFF or there is another more latent source for feeling bad about the feature.
This doesn't invalidate the criticism, it just makes it harder to follow though.
Since I happen to like the feature I hope that the disliking party is small and vocal, but the devs will have the
whole picture of responses and will probably decide based on that.
Edit: I'd also like to add that Vanilla Factorio does not try to capture realism(1 iron plate + 3 wires = circuit board ?),
this was even mentioned in a FFF if I recall correctly. There are popular mods that try to approximate more realistic
production chains, so there is an audience for that, but Vanilla Factorio tries to abstract concepts to make them fun to play. And I see the same here.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
You factory wont go slower because of a feature you dont use it can only go faster, the Quality is only a one way from many that can increase the production of your factory.JKv1 wrote: βFri Sep 08, 2023 4:59 pmUnlikely to be treated as optional. Would YOU run your factory 100% slower knowing that there is a way to make it go brrr? In my case, I dont have any moral misgivings about cheating a system that wishes to pad out gameplay. No. As I did with the Kovarex enrichment process that produces infinite amounts of U238 so that my nuclear plants can run forever with no form of input control whatsoever, I'll mod my way to 100% legendary components DAY1. I won't see hide nor hair of greens or blues or purples.Hi_ImKyle wrote: βFri Sep 08, 2023 4:23 pm People clearly didn't read the whole thing. This entire system is optional. There's no one with a gun to your head saying you have to use it. Just don't unlock the quality modules and you play the game as if they were never there. Problem solved.
The names need changing 100%, a few suggested name sets are great but do not release this with the generic gacha tier names.
Matter of fact, if you bother with those instead of gunning for legendaries immediately, YOU are not only wasting your fictional (ingame) AND actual (your CPU's clock cycles) resources or time, your actually spending watt-hours on no progression AT ALL. Speed Modules Lv3 on Beacons, Prod Lv3 in Assemblers. All of them will be Legendary.
And yes, if I end up not liking it, I will not use it. If I do not like some aspect of a game, I just ignore it and enjoy the other parts that I do like. For example Starfield, I can make a ship in the editor or use a premade one, I do not like the editor and will not use it or the settlement system, I do not like it so will not engage with it, plain and simple.
-
- Inserter
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
I like this idea. Using RNG is good, this encourages the planning of interesting layouts.
My 2 cents for the naming; Crude, Fair, Good, Great, Excellent. But in the end, easily changed; "there's a mod for that".
Higher quality Lamps should illuminate a larger radius?
Cool, great feature, hope to see more!
My 2 cents for the naming; Crude, Fair, Good, Great, Excellent. But in the end, easily changed; "there's a mod for that".
Higher quality Lamps should illuminate a larger radius?
Cool, great feature, hope to see more!
-
- Manual Inserter
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 4:31 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
I think the quality system is a bad idea. It's a sign of 'mobilisiation' of the game, adding randomized content just to make a game take more time to complete. By adding this, you're first taking development time away from other features. Second, you're adding to maintenance time. Third, adding something that gives bonuses like this means you've got to scale out the end game to make it more difficult for those who are using the system. This both wastes more dev/planning time as you have to start running projections using multiple dimensions of production and for those of us who won't be using the system, the end game will be needlessly more difficult. Finally, I want to say THIS is NOT how factories work.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
I'd go with: Decent, Good, Great, Excellent, Perfect.gravityStar wrote: βSat Sep 09, 2023 2:35 pm My 2 cents for the naming; Crude, Fair, Good, Great, Excellent.
-
- Manual Inserter
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2023 2:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
The idea has potential! I really like it.
But I think you should really consider changing the names... the way it's proposed here just doesn't fit Factorio.
If you keep the colors it will still evoke the familiarity from other games.
Then you can adjust the names to something like:
- "Basic, Enhanced, Refined, Precise, Ultimate" or
- "Crude/Handmade, Standardized, Refined, Optimized, Premium"
There's lots of possibilities here and you could come up with some list of terms that makes it really clear which one is the "better" one on first glance while also keeping with the style of the game and adding to its overall theme/immersion.
But I think you should really consider changing the names... the way it's proposed here just doesn't fit Factorio.
If you keep the colors it will still evoke the familiarity from other games.
Then you can adjust the names to something like:
- "Basic, Enhanced, Refined, Precise, Ultimate" or
- "Crude/Handmade, Standardized, Refined, Optimized, Premium"
There's lots of possibilities here and you could come up with some list of terms that makes it really clear which one is the "better" one on first glance while also keeping with the style of the game and adding to its overall theme/immersion.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
Just one more comment opposed to this feature.
What I fear most is managing multiple tiers of everything in every inventory. If different quality tiers don't stack, then inventory bloat will be crazy. But different-quality items do stack, then inventories will be missing information or else be too densely packed with information.
Addressing some of the common opinions:
I consider factorio to be a very elegant game, but this mechanic doesn't feel refined at all.
What I fear most is managing multiple tiers of everything in every inventory. If different quality tiers don't stack, then inventory bloat will be crazy. But different-quality items do stack, then inventories will be missing information or else be too densely packed with information.
Addressing some of the common opinions:
- "Checked if this was April 1st" <- yup.
- "Feels like Kovarex everywhere" <- definitely.
- "It's completely optional, you can simply choose to play without it"
Now this, I totally disagree with. If the best factories/setups all use the highest-quality-everything, then I will use the highest-quality-everything. Players are notoriously good at doing the least-fun thing, just because it's the most efficient. If you've ever spent an hour in an RPG sitting in one place to farm XP, you will absolutely rebuild your whole factory with a mechanic you hate.
I consider factorio to be a very elegant game, but this mechanic doesn't feel refined at all.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
Unless you press F while standing on a belt of a quality-booster factory section, I don't see how you would end up with tons of different quality items. Also quality is a late game feature, so you could easily robot-trash items of undesired quality automatically.
Last edited by morhp on Sat Sep 09, 2023 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
It's not that there aren't plenty of people who don't like it, it's that the people here who don't like it are making long posts about the specific aspects they don't like and how it could be improved, or at least making rational posts that just sum up to "I think this is a bad idea and isn't for me".
Over on Steam you literally have people proclaiming that they will never play Factorio again if this feature is implemented. XD
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him." - Mark Twain
"True friends stab you in the front." - Oscar Wilde
"True friends stab you in the front." - Oscar Wilde
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
And since you do probably only start using quality after getting logistics bots, they can fill your inventory so you don't have to pick them from belts.morhp wrote: βSat Sep 09, 2023 3:03 pmUnless you press F while standing on a belt of a quality-booster factory section, I don't see how you would end up with tons of different quality items. Also quality is a late game feature, so you could easily robot-trash items of undesired quality automatically.
-
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 2:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
Circuit Network left the chat.OdinEidolon wrote: βFri Sep 08, 2023 2:18 pmIt's a shame they wasted development time for such a "feature" but if it's really optional then all is good.
Re: Friday Facts #375 - Quality
Do you even play the game? Kovarex enrichment process has zero rng. It's not like quality at all.factomight wrote: βSat Sep 09, 2023 7:12 amA Kovarex-like process for the majority of all ingame items is a horrible idea. What are you guys thinking?
Worker robot speed 50 is an even bigger "tedious" resource sink and "pointless" ups drain.factomight wrote: βSat Sep 09, 2023 7:12 amThis is not complexity, its just a tedious resource sink and a pointless drain on UPS.