Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
Forum rules
Circuit-free solutions of basic factory-design to achieve optimal item-throughput
-
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:48 am
- Contact:
Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
I didn't realize this was possible, but, I used to use a modified version of this arrangement; when I fixed it up a bit for 0.16 side-loading.... Lo and behold.... see for yourself. After a bit of stuttering at startup, I am pretty sure it could go on and on like this for days.
This notably strongly suggests that at least three full blue belts must be extractable from a train-car with the right amount of spaghetti.
Obviously with four ex-serters on the box, and no "sides" left for in-serters this requires robots or hand-feeding.This notably strongly suggests that at least three full blue belts must be extractable from a train-car with the right amount of spaghetti.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
I think I can improve it a little bit.
We can make it shorter and splitter is not needed actually. or, if you need more space Also, as 1 chest > blue belt this setup does its job, meanwhile, it's easier to have 3-wide setup instead of 5-wide, but it will require 2 chests.
We can make it shorter and splitter is not needed actually. or, if you need more space Also, as 1 chest > blue belt this setup does its job, meanwhile, it's easier to have 3-wide setup instead of 5-wide, but it will require 2 chests.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
You can do it in a 5x5 square.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
That's impressive ) I'll take it )
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
No, I did something wrong
To get full compression, there need to be at least one belt segment after the inserters to buffer the swings. I knew that! Damn...
Two solutions. the second one is inside a 5x5, lucky me.
To get full compression, there need to be at least one belt segment after the inserters to buffer the swings. I knew that! Damn...
Two solutions. the second one is inside a 5x5, lucky me.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
I like the lower one. Thanks
BTW - how do you spawn these purple undergrounds in Sandbox? I assume it's unlimited consumption belt? I haven't found a console command for it.
BTW - how do you spawn these purple undergrounds in Sandbox? I assume it's unlimited consumption belt? I haven't found a console command for it.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
I use the mod "editor extentions" in editor mode for testbuilds.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
it's built in as an infinity chest; these editor extensions entities are all working via lua on_tick scripting and it's expensive. of course you might not care if you're just setting up a small thing here and there.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
The editor extensions version is a loader and infinty chest combined, and you can set items per lane. Not sure about the "on tick"stuff, as far as i can see this is only used for something to do with the infinity wagon.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
Rotating (default key: R) after placing will switch between load/unload. The infinity chest should have "Infinity filters" empty and "Remove unfiltered items" set to create an infinite sink.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
Wow. Tricky stuff. Works, though.
- NotRexButCaesar
- Smart Inserter
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:47 am
- Contact:
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
Raiguard switches the inventory of an infinity chest and a wagon to simulate an infinity wagon.
Ⅲ—Crevez, chiens, si vous n'étes pas contents!
- NotRexButCaesar
- Smart Inserter
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:47 am
- Contact:
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
Rotate the loader after you place it.
Ⅲ—Crevez, chiens, si vous n'étes pas contents!
- eradicator
- Smart Inserter
- Posts: 5211
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
Tried a bunch of things to remove the sideloading, but I can only get 43i/s. (Stack size override 7/11).
Author of: Belt Planner, Hand Crank Generator, Screenshot Maker, /sudo and more.
Mod support languages: 日本語, Deutsch, English
My code in the post above is dedicated to the public domain under CC0.
Mod support languages: 日本語, Deutsch, English
My code in the post above is dedicated to the public domain under CC0.
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
Sorry for stupid question. What do you mean by sideloading and why to remove it?eradicator wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 5:41 am Tried a bunch of things to remove the sideloading, but I can only get 43i/s. (Stack size override 7/11).
- eradicator
- Smart Inserter
- Posts: 5211
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Fully compressing a blue belt with one box
It's when one belt loads onto the other from the side. Using one continous belt means the engine has to calculate fewer seperate belt segments, thus giving a very tiny UPS boost. But if the resulting belt isn't fully compressed that's bad for UPS again. In either case the effect might be too small to be relevant even in megabases. So I mostly tried it because I find assymetrical sideloading not very aesthetically pleasing.KAA wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 12:49 pmSorry for stupid question. What do you mean by sideloading and why to remove it?eradicator wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 5:41 am Tried a bunch of things to remove the sideloading, but I can only get 43i/s. (Stack size override 7/11).
If two chests were allowed then the classic stack override 12/8 scheme fully compresses both lanes.
Author of: Belt Planner, Hand Crank Generator, Screenshot Maker, /sudo and more.
Mod support languages: 日本語, Deutsch, English
My code in the post above is dedicated to the public domain under CC0.
Mod support languages: 日本語, Deutsch, English
My code in the post above is dedicated to the public domain under CC0.