![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Moderator: ickputzdirwech
I couldn't figure out how to be honestFreeER wrote:Interesting, but why did you make a new topic/thread for this instead of including it in the old one?
Depends.. If you accept the theory of time being just another dimension, it could be fine. (Day-night cycle would be simply dependant on the star position at the time inside the field) Such thing might/should require more and more energy as the time difference gets bigger, though.SilverWarior wrote: Your teory is imposible. Even if you have some field where time runs at different speed the day and night cycle would still be perfectly synchronized with the outside area of thiss time dilation field. Why? Because day and night cycles really on star position which is actually outside the time dilation field.
What such field would do is only that day and night cycles would seem longer or shorter inside the time dilation field than outside it.
+1andzoak wrote:I think that capacitors produce less amount of paradoxes
For this to work the stars should also be inside the time dilation field. But I got a feeling that you would only like to have smal localized time fields so no stars are inside that field therefore you can not have different day/night cycle inside the field as outside the field if both places are being shined on by the same stars.MF- wrote:Day-night cycle would be simply dependant on the star position at the time inside the field
Yes, it works like that WHEN you strip out the 4th dimension condition (that's why I put it there!)SilverWarior wrote:For this to work the stars should also be inside the time dilation field. But I got a feeling that you would only like to have smal localized time fields so no stars are inside that field therefore you can not have different day/night cycle inside the field as outside the field if both places are being shined on by the same stars.MF- wrote:Day-night cycle would be simply dependant on the star position at the time inside the field
So you are actuall talking about interdimensional rits then.MF- wrote:Yes, it works like that WHEN you strip out the 4th dimension condition (that's why I put it there!)SilverWarior wrote:For this to work the stars should also be inside the time dilation field. But I got a feeling that you would only like to have smal localized time fields so no stars are inside that field therefore you can not have different day/night cycle inside the field as outside the field if both places are being shined on by the same stars.MF- wrote:Day-night cycle would be simply dependant on the star position at the time inside the field