Coal from burned trees

Post your ideas and suggestions how to improve the game.

Moderator: ickputzdirwech

PowerMasterFTW
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:48 pm
Contact:

Coal from burned trees

Post by PowerMasterFTW »

Like the title proposes, lets say you flame thrower a massive forest, and most of the trees become dead trees, what if you got coal from those trees (or maybe charcoal if they would add it)
bobucles
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 10:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Coal from burned trees

Post by bobucles »

Sounds pretty neat. Burn a tree, it turns black, and you deconstruct it for coal. I like it.
Koub
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 7955
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:54 am
Contact:

Re: Coal from burned trees

Post by Koub »

That would be quite bothersome : you'd have to get coal for less energy than the live tree containsso maybe what ? 1 coal per tree ? a 1k tree forest would lead to less coal than one tile in a patch, and yet be a pain in the ass to collect.
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
User avatar
bobingabout
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 7352
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Coal from burned trees

Post by bobingabout »

I'd like to see... Stick wood in a furnace, get (char)coal (Like in minecraft). of course since you're making it to use in places where the game uses coal already, it would have to be coal, not charcoal, because there's currently no provision in the recipe definitions to say "This item, or that item", so, you can't say "Coal or Charcoal", meaning you either have to use the same item, or duplicate the recipe.
Creator of Bob's mods. Expanding your gameplay since version 0.9.8.
I also have a Patreon.
bobucles
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 10:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Coal from burned trees

Post by bobucles »

Trees harvest for 4 wood. For a direct 1:1 energy return you'd need to get 2 coal instead. But not all trees burn into charcoal. A large portion die outright, which you can test for yourself by setting any forest on fire.

Anyway anything that amounts to less than a few thousand coal is not a balance issue. The question is if it'd be neat, which it would be. I wholeheartedly support burning forests down for more resources!
Post Reply

Return to “Ideas and Suggestions”