2 March , no advance at all.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60606539.amp
This is a normal practice introduced by the USA. Everyone here knows about case law?FuryoftheStars wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:23 pmAh, yes, because it actually takes someone to say "I'm at war with you" for a full on military incursion and people dying all over the place to actually be considered a "war".
Again, "they did it" isn't a valid excuse, and I don't support the US doing it, either.Djmixxx wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:29 pmThis is a normal practice introduced by the USA. Everyone here knows about case law?FuryoftheStars wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:23 pmAh, yes, because it actually takes someone to say "I'm at war with you" for a full on military incursion and people dying all over the place to actually be considered a "war".
FuryoftheStars wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:16 pmHow about that some of these civilians simply don't want to leave?
Or are afraid of coming out of the bunkers in an effort to escape when the shelling doesn't stop? (Despite agreeing to a cease-fire to allow civilians to escape, for at least 2 days in a row the Russians have broken that cease fire... with artillery.)
Or how about that the "escape corridors" the Russians are leaving open mostly lead to Russia or their allies?
Or that some are too old, sick, frail, or injured and unable to be evacuated, and some people volunteered to stay behind to take care of them?
.FuryoftheStars wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:20 pmSo that's a valid reason to support the invasion? Even if it were true that the Ukrainian soldiers are hiding behind their civilians, your logic is even sicker.
Unfortunately, the world does not live by concepts, it lives by laws, no matter how bad they are.FuryoftheStars wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:34 pmAgain, "they did it" isn't a valid excuse, and I don't support the US doing it, either.
The big mass media in the west are often financed by "mysterious" private organizations/persons. What do you think, what they do report? Independent from whom? People who speak against the ruling opinion, won't end in jail, that's good. But there are more subtle ways to suppress uncomfortable opinions.Tertius wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 2:44 pmThere are fundamental differences in how people from "the west" perceive newspapers (and news in general) and how people from "the east" perceive them. In "the west", the press is free and independent by law. The press isn't controlled by a (mysterious) 3rd party. It's allowed (and encouraged) to print whatever it wants, regardless of what the government or warlord wants. This does not mean every press is serious and accurate - it's just allowed to write what it wants. And this actually happens: you get a large amount of good information, and a large amount of junk as well. You have to read multiple different sources to get to the bottom of it.
This argument basically says, some politicians couldn't get away with lies, so everyone couldn't get away with it. But, you won't hear much about those, who get away, because well... they got away with it.It has been proven in the last 70 years that the press is really independent, because every time politicians tried to suppress information or putting pressure upon the press, courts were involved, the politicians lost their case, and the most important thing: the politicians accepted that ruling. You can find these rulings. You are able to study journalism and learn about the rights you can enforce against the government.
Where you find this? Donbass was target of diplomatic conversation before so called " special operation" . Reason for operation I am already posted.
The "mainstream" media is a term everyboody uses without a clear definition. It is those that do not have schocking view for the masses. Sometimes the truth is indeed schocking and concealed away from the "maintream" media.jodokus31 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:50 pm
The big mass media in the west are often financed by "mysterious" private organizations/persons. What do you think, what they do report? Independent from whom? People who speak against the ruling opinion, won't end in jail, that's good. But there are more subtle ways to suppress uncomfortable opinions.
Since I am German, I usually read German sources. Main sources are https://www.faz.net/, a somewhat conservative media with own reporters, and https://www.n-tv.de/, a more trashy and dpa message distributing ticker-like media, but with their own reporters as well. Other sources are mostly IT newstickers, which also take part in some political articles: https://www.heise.de/ and https://www.golem.de/
You can check https://meduza.io/en and https://tvrain.ru/news/
Confirm. It was free press just past month, which can read all Russia (but russian marked it , as financed from US) how RT was marked as financed by Russiaenterisys wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 4:07 pmYou can check https://meduza.io/en and https://tvrain.ru/news/
Thats the last independent news from russia that were banned a couple days ago and now work from abroad.
If you read the Latvian press, Germany is sometimes either flooded or there are riots all around, arranged by emigrants.
In summer, there a was an extremely severe flooding in middle-west of germany.
Funny/interesting to see the outside view.
I have the same impression, that information for some people reaches through a very strict internal firewall.
Just like they said they weren't going to invade and it was all just "training exercises", right?Djmixxx wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:42 pm.FuryoftheStars wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:20 pmSo that's a valid reason to support the invasion? Even if it were true that the Ukrainian soldiers are hiding behind their civilians, your logic is even sicker.
Russia will stop 'in a moment' if Ukraine meets terms
-Kremlin says it insists on neutrality for Ukraine
-Russia "will finish" demilitarisation of the country
-Wants Kyiv to recognise breakaway regions, loss of Crimea
If you know peaceful solutions to the conflict with the pro-American Ukrainian authorities, write.
I don't support the third point, but I and you don't live there and I can't say how much the residents needed it.
There's more to the term "war" than the mere legal declaration of being "at war". You're right, Russia has not declared as being "at war", but that doesn't mean that the conflict isn't a "war".