Why do you request a new load only when the need is more than one load? Wouldn't it be better to use request a load as soon as you need one? Looks like a bug, haven't noticed it in practice yet myself, it will only effect flex trains and most of those don't get full yet on my base I'll have to upda...

About tweaking station / train wagons - why not have # of wagons as a BP parameter? (or as value in constant combinator) You'd have to set that everytime you place it down, and it would pretty much always be the same value so i made a video showing how to customize it to your needs instead and then...

sutech wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 4:14 pm Hi, if i play with combo trains like one vagon of acid and three vagons of uranium, its possible ??
sorry my english is basic...

ya you can do stuff like that but will want to make them dedicated so they don't show up to other stations they can't do any good at

Hey can you explain why "Read train contents" and "Read train count" is necessary in the depot station? I tried to disable them and it stopped working but i can't figure out why. read contents is important to signal to other waiting trains that you already have those materials o...

i narrowed it down to putting a 'name' on the icon types, apparently naming them (even if you use the name field as a description) causes it to assume its a parameter even if parameter isn't checked, and even if the parameter isn't even shown

Hi! Love the ideas behind the blueprint, however my trains are 1-4-0, what do I change to make your logic compatible with different cargo wagon amounts? Could you maybe add this to the parameter questionnaire? I made a covering what you need to change to make your own custom alterations to the BPs ...

Updated to 2.0.3a : fixed the train carts being treated as parameterized when they shouldn't be added flex fluid trains! renamed fluid supply stations to differentiate between item suppy stations added signalling for 'is full' for fluid supply and fluid demand stations added circuit network connecti...

I think interrupts and logistic groups and group train definitions should OVERRIDE existing ones when there is a same name siutation, so blueprints can be upgraded more easily

otherwise we have to add a version string to all of those things, which is doable, so there is a workaround either way

Made a much better video explaining its use: https://youtu.be/CuYDZV47ht8

I noticed on several of my parameterized blueprints it sets certain things as parameters when they weren't before it is also adding train signals in which didn't exist in my original version Here it is adding 5 minutes to the process of importing my blueprints :cry: https://youtu.be/CuYDZV47ht8?t=393

Updated to 2.0.2 fixes some overprovisioning issues with multiple supply stations, didn't have time to make a good edited video lol

i already accounted for that and covered it in the video...

only the dedicated ones will generally ever be loaded in the depot

no known problems so far, it's working great

This seems to have been fixed in 2.0.16, not seeing it anymore.

yep its a dupe of that

you can't reference constant combinator signals in a train interrupt formula though

it might not be a bug i guess its more of a limitation, a gap in the feature

Intangir's Vanilla Train Network I updated my vanilla train network to work with factorio 2.0+ (and space age) The implementation is totally re-rebuilt (and relatively untested so this is alpha) using the new 2.0 features for parameterized BPs, and train interrupts. VERY powerful tools. You use it ...

Even with train limit set to ZERO it STILL triggers a condition 'station not full'

i could've sworn in other situations earlier it wasn't triggering but now i can't get it to stop..

There seems to be no way to avoid triggering on unreachable stations at the moment There is a 'not full' condition, but it goes off even when the station is disabled, (when it ought to have a train limit of 0 imo, its not pathable) there is also no condition for 'station enabled/disabled', either we...

I noticed that if you have a negative number in a constant combinator for example (maybe other things) in the blueprint parameters it shows the value TWICE, once as the signed negative, and a second time as like an unsigned overflow version? is this intended or a bug? seems very confusing if intende...

We still need to be able to use/refer to these like global variables, even if its only in the formula somehow

i want to define a number of train cars 'globally' in a named section which is shared map wide, and reference that number in formulas even if we cant change them in the blueprint parameters