I honestly thought this was how it worked initially. It just seems way more intuitive. The only real downside is accidentally mixing belts and losing quality materials which is a factory design challange, not a gave design issue

I was about to post this request as well. I'd like to make science on demand (mostly for the perishable one) and this would let us do that with circuits

Allow bridging signals from planets to the space platforms above them using radars. As far as I know there's no way to send signals to space platforms or between planets, and there's plenty of logic that is impossible as a result.

As a side request, some sort of deep space satelite or space radar ...

I was just about to post this exact suggestion. Looks like you beat me to it

This seems to be fixed in 2.0.12

Huh I didn't know that, thanks. Still though, stack inserters are much further in the game than combinators (or wires that we get at the start)

Now that we have assemblers that can have their inventory and read through the circuit network, how about reading furnaces in a similar way? With the introduction of quality, one solution is to control how much material is fed into a furnace for steal and stone bricks to gaurentee they never get ...

Setting a wildcard (such as "Anything") in a train station does not cause the name to update when given a circuit condition. Display panels work like this so I'd expect train stops would too


Blueprint:
0eNq9lFFvozAMx7/K5OcwrQVaFan3KfZWVShA1kYHgUtMO1Tx3WeHQW8duuNeTpUqYse ...

Given the setup:
- A train has two interrupts A and B, with B set to "Allow interrupting other interrupts"
- The train has triggered A and is waiting at A's station for conditions
- The player manually sends the train to a station in it's schedule (let's say C)

The train will:
- Go to C as manually ...

I like the idea. I was also thinking about how to fix bitters, possibly by adding a new radar that can predict when the next attack is to avoid forcing the player to drop what their doing to deal with it.

Nothing, but it would make it virtually impossible to multiplex a bunch of songs if they can't specify their instruments.

Say I have 3 sets of combinators that output notes on signals 0->4 with note values for each speaker. If I could set the instruments with each song, I could also have signals ...

TL;DR
Allow a speaker's instrument to be set based on a given circuit signal.


What ?
Hello!

Currently, we can set the note to be played on a speaker by a circuit signal but not the instrument. This suggestion is to also allow the instrument to be set in a similar way.

As far as specifics go ...

Of course! Also, feel free to use any of the CI stuff I've put together, if you feel like it.

Ah, I just stumbled upon this mod while looking for how other people handled making surfaces. I just started a fairly similar mod actually, but maybe I should abandon it and think of another idea :? .

Here's a link to the idea so far (there isn't any code yet, other than CI stuff) https://github ...

Sounds like a great addition. It would make getting around much easier (and less destructive) imo