When selecting an item, double clicking a quality selection button should also accept the choice (i.e. press the OK button which looks like a green checkbox).

Why? Because it is faster and requires less mouse movement in some cases. There is no downside.

I have updated the blueprint to tidy up the splitters. use tier 2 modules, label the inputs more cleanly, and remove an unnecessary roboport

I would like this fixed as well

This could be easily implemented if the game just adds a circuit variable to the cargo hub "Distance Traveled" which can then be used in combinator logic to shut the engines off. It would also be cool if circuits could change the destination of the ship.

TL;DR, What?
Dialog boxes (for example "Select a signal") should give focus to the quantity edit box (if present) upon opening.

Why?
It should be possible to input numbers with the left hand, without the right hand leaving the mouse. Since TAB for cycling the focused edit box doesn't work, this ...

Allowing connection to the logistics network obviates the need for a wire to a roboport. This is a superior solution, because it lets you make a self-contained functional unit. Currently if you make a blueprint for a small machine you may have to put in the description "remember to connect a red ...

How about instead, a checkbox to optionally sort them alphabetically? This would keep the order the same over time.

Space Age fluid tanks should have the `quality_affects_capacity` property.

There are mods which offer quality fluid wagons (and cargo wagons). And the lack of quality fluid tanks to store the fluids unloaded from quality cargo wagons makes a clumsy situation for users of those mods.

This bug is still happening to me and I didn't start playing until this year.

Suggestion: Allow circuit network wires to connect farther away when the endpoints are asteroid collectors. At least far enough to connect two normal quality collectors which are at the minimum non-overlapping distance.

derp... I thought I had a unique idea lol

Great minds think alike.... I would love this.

Request groups are a great feature, and when you shift+click an assembler and then paste that onto a requestor chest, it could work as follows:

* Create an anonymous request group whose contents are identical to the recipe of the item
* Set the multiplier of this request group to ensure 30 seconds ...

Wow... I learned another thing The pipette is a game-changer. Setting the logistics condition on every assembler in an item mall is a hassle.

When connecting an assembler with a configured recipe to the logistics network, the logistics condition should default to the item being produced. Alternatively, there could be a small button which fills in this default on press.

Yes that did it, thanks!

I can't seem to get past this:

I copied the Program Files/Factorio directory to c:\Factorio, deleted the shortcuts, and yet when I try to run both instances I still get some error about a lock file.

I like to support the devs.

I did download "Setup_FactorioSpaceAge_2.0.32.exe.zip", unpacked the files and then ran that installer. Inside were three .bin files totaling a little over 4GB and one .exe at 2,713KB. The result was installed to "C:\Program Files\Factorio" and there were shortcuts ...

I have been playing the Steam version since 2016 and I started playing Space Age this year. I bought a second copy of the game directly from the site and I installed it, yet when I run the copy I get an error about a lock file. I studied the wiki and forum posts on how to configure a second instance ...