I am not seeing any bugs here, some mods added second fluid and possibly the same mods added second fluid box to assemblers to make those recipes craftable. Given this is modded and there was no save file provided i am going to throw this to Not a bug.

Even in base game there are some machines that ...

Sounds similar to 118266

Isn't this just https://lua-api.factorio.com/latest/cla ... onnections ?

I am considering this to be minor enough to not need this to be fixed at that moment. There was already some attempts at doing something similar and it was causing problems (https://forums.factorio.com/119271). What you are describing as "expected" suggests that items that were on top-right should ...

I am considering this implemented for 2.1.

Ref https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?p=628542#p628542
I will have to reconsider if anything signal should be allowed on the output side. Ability of setting anything output was added when there was no selector combinator yet and as such it was only a trick to get one signal out of many. Now ...

I am not seeing any bugs here. Thrusters have pipe connections across diagonals so first thruster gets fuel on top left pipe and oxidizer on bottom left which is correct. Second thruster sees oxidizer on the top left input which is wrong fluid and fuel on the bottom left input which is also wrong ...

This checkbox only shows up when you have mods enabled that are using a "space travel" feature flag. Not a bug.

There are some items that are considered a "low value" and are better voided rather than moved to hub because they could easily cause hub overflow. Default list of items that are moved to hub are: modules, items that build entities, items that build tiles and non-intermediate items if they cannot be ...

Eh... Demolisher consists of multiple entities, a head, multiple segments and tail. So what you are describing is that when opening factoriopedia just for the head of a demolisher, a total yield of all entities that are part of a demolisher should be added up and shown in factoriopedia. I have mixed ...

I am not seeing any bugs here. Factoriopedia shows "Big demolisher remains" which is an entity that is spawned from a demolisher segment, while the deconstruction planner shows yield of mining all of the big demolisher remains, which are tungsten ore.

"Big demolisher remains" != "tungsten ore" and ...

Thanks for the report. It looks like the drawing is correct as it draws signals that are indeed present on the right side, it is just the gui that refuses to draw those signals since they are not allowed there. For 2.1 i adjusted decider logic to reject special signals on the right side of ...

Added LuaHelpers::stage read (returning "settings", "prototype" or "runtime") for 2.1.

This will be fixed in 2.1.

I did some adjustments for 2.1 and changed it slightly towards what i think it should look like. I think this resolves this report.

I am going to throw this to Not a bug. This situation is a malformed mod which does not allow selecting any qualitities and as such expected behavior would be to not allow selecting recipe at all because none can be selected. If you really want i can make "normal" quality prototype to be unable to ...

Not a bug.

Logistic condition is intentionally always false when out of logistic network range. If you do not want inserter to be disabled by logistic condition, uncheck the "connect" checkbox.

Looks like it is a side effect of display panel having selection box that is non square that is not centered since wire reach is based on distance between entity selection boxes (except when measured between electric poles but this is unrelated)

Given that those 2 crashes are completly unrelated to each other i suspect a hardware problem, either ram or cpu, however since you have 14700K cpu, it is likely you may need to update bios to avoid cpu degradation however if your cpu has degraded too much already it may need to be RMA'd to a ...

Those robots in the alert were already reassigned to a different logistic network. One of roboports to which those robots were assigned to is at position [gps=128.5,-75.5] on nauvis. That entity is based on the RoboportPrototype and does not provide stationing spots for robots and as such it is a ...