Loewchen wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:16 pm

viewtopic.php?f=58&t=68280

Yes I know. I linked to that, but I this is worse.

Yes, I know this is very similar to this rejected report.

But IMHO it just looks kinda bad. Much more conspicuous then belts over uranium ore.

Although shipping in uranium might also be a strong option. ? Why? On this planet petroleum is obtained through farming, thus it's renewable. And CO2 emissions are not a concern. It looks to me that Ii there is anything that could use some uranium treatment here it's behemoth stompers. Well I agree...

Mycroft4114 wrote: ↑

Fri Aug 16, 2024 5:00 pm

Say, quick question - Gleba has no coal... or Uranium. How are you getting all this power? From farming products you say? Ah, good, no problem there then, carry on...

Seems like it. Although shipping in Uranium might also be a strong option.

You can always switch the left and right-click functionality yourself in the Controls settings. If you've played minecraft a lot I can definitely see why you'd prefer that, but I think it's too late to change the defaults as it would be very confusing for current Factorio players.

Sorry if that title is confusing, here's an illustration which makes it a lot clearer: What I do: Before.jpg What I hoped for: Good.jpg What actually happens: Bad.jpg The tricky thing is it seems the belt segment which is ultimately deleted is first replaced with the "up" underground segme...

Just in case this is a good time to mention it, my #1 wish for the mod manager is an easy way to update currently enabled mods only. Over the years I've downloaded a lot of mods and "mod packs", but of course I only use a limited set of them at any one time. e.g. maybe right now I'm runnin...

I think what you do is make sure you have enough trains to saturate all producer stops. If you have more (for example) copper ore than you need right now, that just means every copper mine will have a full train waiting for a place to deliver it. Trains are not expensive, so this is fine. Remember t...

Hell yes! I might not buy the expansion on release day, just because I basically never do that, but barring severe launch issues which I don't expect to occur, I would get it within a week at most. If I do hold off for a little bit, I'll probably hold off on starting a serious game in 2.0 as well, j...

So based on current votes, it looks like a popular scale would be something like:

1. Normal
2. Improved
3. Superior
4. Exceptional
5. Perfect

Sounds good to me.

TL;DR I think it would be cool to have research that increased the effectiveness of radars. What ? A new infinite research branching off of radar technology. Mostly this would increase the scan speed, but perhaps the final non-infinite level could increased the always-revealed radius by one as well...

I have one request though: now that you have super force building. Maybe it is a good idea to move cliff deconstruction to super force building instead of regular force building? That would be nice. I too have had situations where I destroy cliffs when I didn't mean to and it can be frustrating. If...

At first I was like "Wait, it can read THAT?". But then I realized that the entries don't even match the length of the blurred bits, so it just read the "Space map" headline and hallucinated fitting names. Classic large language model :lol: Someone on Reddit attempted it with a ...

Regarding quality names (yes I'm still stuck on that), I'd just like something fairly simple and neutral, like: Standard, Good, Fine, Exceptional, Perfect I've noticed a lot of the player suggestions have had a negative term (such as "rough") for the lowest, but that seems misleading. On t...

It would be more intuitive if the first tier of quality just had no symbol/dot at all, meaning " no particular quality". The dots can be viewed rather as badges this way. Also there is no need to explain/argue why the dots of Q1 items are not visible in the world and why the symbols you'r...

Is there any good reason why the "Host saved game" option doesn't prompt you to sync mods with the save like the single player "Load game" menu does? I'm almost tempted to call this a bug, but perhaps there's some logic that escapes me. None the less I suggest that when selecting...

That sounds good too, but I'm not sure I understand exactly how it relates. I guess the same sort of "playstyle" selector could be included on the Update tab, but even if it were I'd still like "currently loaded mods" to be included as an option as well.

TL;DR It would be nice to have a quick way to update only the currently loaded mods in the build-in mod manager. What ? I'd like to have either a button to select only the mods currently loaded, or just have only the loaded mods checked by default when you first go to the update tab. Why ? If you h...

Usul wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:01 pm

Nope. Try it.... stopped belt with wire connected-> Status: "Working".

So did try it, and got a different result. Oddly it says "disabled by control behavior", which is awfully cryptic, but at least the disabled part is right.

Only bit I'm a little skeptical about is ghosts replacing physical buildings. Guess I'll have to wait and see how I like it, but I wonder if an option to enable or disable this would be good.