Search found 95 matches
- Mon Aug 11, 2025 1:50 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Theorycrafting: Maximum Possible SPM Without Bots
- Replies: 10
- Views: 739
Re: Theorycrafting: Maximum Possible SPM Without Bots
"Of course, just moving items from the landing pad to a chest doesn't help: we need to get them out onto belts"
Actually you can use legendary Stack inserters to unload from landing pad to Cargo wagon or to the Rocket silo, and then legendary Stack inserters to green belts, so you will have ...
- Fri Aug 08, 2025 10:10 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Theorycrafting: Maximum Possible SPM Without Bots
- Replies: 10
- Views: 739
Re: Theorycrafting: Maximum Possible SPM Without Bots
Cool analysis! The only factor I can spot that you're missing is rocket part ingredients import to Aquilo, but I doubt they'd make much of a difference at 300% productivity.
I think the theoretical maximum botless SPM is actually much higher if you put labs on your space platforms. In this case ...
- Wed Aug 06, 2025 5:15 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Theorycrafting: Maximum Possible SPM Without Bots
- Replies: 10
- Views: 739
Theorycrafting: Maximum Possible SPM Without Bots
Maximum Botless SPM
TL;DR: Without using bots, the maximum possible SPM, before Lab Productivity research, is somewhere between 'slightly less than 2154.5k' and 'slightly less than 1139.8k' normal packs of each type per minute.
So, this is an exercise in theorycrafting, looking at what the ...
TL;DR: Without using bots, the maximum possible SPM, before Lab Productivity research, is somewhere between 'slightly less than 2154.5k' and 'slightly less than 1139.8k' normal packs of each type per minute.
So, this is an exercise in theorycrafting, looking at what the ...
- Wed Dec 11, 2024 7:28 am
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [Kovarex] [2.0.23] Parameterized blueprint cannot set certain biochamber recipes unless biochamber already exists
- Replies: 2
- Views: 815
[Kovarex] [2.0.23] Parameterized blueprint cannot set certain biochamber recipes unless biochamber already exists
Here is a blueprint for a basic parameterized bot-served biochamber*. (Note: I play with Bob's Adjustable Inserters. This blueprint contains only basic straight inserters, so it should be compatible with vanilla Factorio, but if it doesn't work, then install 'bobinserters 1.3.2 ...
- Wed Dec 11, 2024 7:28 am
- Forum: Duplicates
- Topic: [2.0.23] Blueprint where param is both machine recipe and logistics filter does not allow selecting recipe
- Replies: 2
- Views: 806
[2.0.23] Blueprint where param is both machine recipe and logistics filter does not allow selecting recipe
If a parameterized blueprint has a parameter which sets the recipe for a machine, then normally when placing the blueprint the user is offered a dialogue which allows them to select from the recipes that machine can perform. It is even smart enough that, if the blueprint contains multiple types of ...
- Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:02 pm
- Forum: Translations
- Topic: [2.0.21] (Most) Biological things do not recycle into spoilage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1126
Re: [2.0.21] (Most) Biological things do not recycle into spoilage
You missed wood (obviously biological) and agricultural science packs (not prima facie biological, but they spoil into spoilage, so what else can they be?), which both also recycle into themselves.
I suspect that text might be a holdover from some earlier step in development, when it was planned ...
I suspect that text might be a holdover from some earlier step in development, when it was planned ...
- Fri Dec 06, 2024 10:33 pm
- Forum: Gameplay Help
- Topic: What is 'Lightning reach' and how do you improve it?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1265
What is 'Lightning reach' and how do you improve it?
The range for normal-quality Lightning Rods and Lightning Collectors are listed as '15 + Lightning reach' and '25 + Lightning reach' respectively. When I saw this, I initially assumed it would be something like worker robot speed: 15/25 was the base value, but there would be some research (possibly ...
- Sun Dec 01, 2024 2:32 am
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [boskid][2.0.21] Some signals cannot be parameterized
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1387
[boskid][2.0.21] Some signals cannot be parameterized
Certain signals cannot be parameterized in blueprints. If you hit 'parameterize blueprint' on a blueprint where these signals are set, the signal they are set to is not offered as a parameterizable value. If you have the same signal used elsewhere in the blueprint and make it a parameter, the value ...
- Sat Nov 30, 2024 2:55 am
- Forum: Duplicates
- Topic: [2.0.21-5] Cannot parameterize inserter 'Set stack size' control signal
- Replies: 5
- Views: 849
Re: [2.0.21-5] Cannot parameterize inserter 'Set stack size' control signal
Hrm. Looks like the same issue exists for the 'Read working' parameter on assemblers.
- Fri Nov 29, 2024 7:47 am
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [Kovarex] [2.0.15] Quality change ignored when placing parametrized blueprint
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3915
Re: [2.0.15] Quality change ignored when placing parametrized blueprint
I suspect this is the side-effect of an intended - and honestly quite useful, if poorly documented and explained - behaviour. Namely, the ability to make a blueprint that refers to a given item at multiple quality levels. For instance, I have a blueprint that I use to build a set of 5 storage chests ...
- Fri Nov 29, 2024 4:11 am
- Forum: Duplicates
- Topic: [2.0.21-5] Cannot parameterize inserter 'Set stack size' control signal
- Replies: 5
- Views: 849
- Tue Nov 26, 2024 7:00 pm
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Reduce Belt Immunity power draw and/or make it cost power only when on a belt
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1503
Re: Reduce Belt Immunity power draw and/or make it cost power only when on a belt
+1
Perhaps not necessarily a 10x reduction, but something to make it worth using at green tier. Right away when you unlock it, it's the only thing you can spend power on at all, but as soon as you unlock roboports it's in your interests not to use it until power armor.
I'd say 10kW makes sense ...
- Tue Nov 26, 2024 4:08 pm
- Forum: Duplicates
- Topic: [2.0.21-5] Cannot parameterize inserter 'Set stack size' control signal
- Replies: 5
- Views: 849
Re: [2.0.21-5] Cannot parameterize inserter 'Set stack size' control signal
@Loewchen: How is this a duplicate? I'm not talking about parameterization altering a constant stack size when it shouldn't; I'm talking about not being able to parameterize what signal is used to dynamically set stack size.
- Tue Nov 26, 2024 5:24 am
- Forum: Duplicates
- Topic: [2.0.21-5] Cannot parameterize inserter 'Set stack size' control signal
- Replies: 5
- Views: 849
[2.0.21-5] Cannot parameterize inserter 'Set stack size' control signal
You cannot parameterize what signal the 'Set stack size' option uses.
This blueprint contains an inserter with 'Set stack size' enabled and the signal set to [Wooden Chest]. If you try hitting the 'Parameterize blueprint' button, it says there's nothing to parameterize:
0eNptkOFugzAMhN ...
This blueprint contains an inserter with 'Set stack size' enabled and the signal set to [Wooden Chest]. If you try hitting the 'Parameterize blueprint' button, it says there's nothing to parameterize:
0eNptkOFugzAMhN ...
- Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:46 pm
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Reduce Belt Immunity power draw and/or make it cost power only when on a belt
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1503
Re: Reduce Belt Immunity power draw and/or make it cost power only when on a belt
But far worse, covering that 100kW draw through Nauvis's night would demand 226kJ of battery capacity - more than 11 Mk1 personal batteries. Battery is 20 MJ which is 200 seconds of 100 kW draw. Certainly longer than Nauvis night.
Huh. You're right. I think I misread the battery capacity as 20 ...
- Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:55 am
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Reduce Belt Immunity power draw and/or make it cost power only when on a belt
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1503
Reduce Belt Immunity power draw and/or make it cost power only when on a belt
Belt Immunity Equipment draws 100kW of power constantly, whether on a belt or not. This makes it entirely impractical to use until you have at least a Portable Fission Reactor - which is really annoying, because the early Modular Armour era is exactly when being immune to belts would be most useful ...
- Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:48 am
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Show history of maximum power generation in electric network graph
- Replies: 0
- Views: 377
Show history of maximum power generation in electric network graph
The electric network window shows a history of power production and consumption, as well as accumulator charge level. But the power production graph only shows the actual power generation, not the maximum power generation available. Having a history of that would be very helpful for things like ...
- Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:36 am
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Out-of-logistics-network warning for buildings with 'Connect to logistics network' checked
- Replies: 0
- Views: 306
Out-of-logistics-network warning for buildings with 'Connect to logistics network' checked
If you build a logistics chest outside of logistics coverage, you get a nice little warning icon. However, if you have a building which is set to enable itself based on the contents of the logistics network (all buildings which can be enabled or disabled using a circuit network also have an option ...
- Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:04 am
- Forum: Won't fix.
- Topic: [2.0.20] Undoing downgrade of Assembler 2 to Assembler 1 does not restore recipe that requires fluid ingredient
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1014
Re: [2.0.20] Undoing downgrade of Assembler 2 to Assembler 1 does not restore recipe that requires fluid ingredient
@boskid: Do you still require more information?
- Sat Nov 23, 2024 1:06 pm
- Forum: Not a bug
- Topic: [2.0.20-3] Decider combinator set to 'Each (red) = 0, output input (green) each' outputs nothing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1084
Re: [2.0.20-3] Decider combinator set to 'Each (red) = 0, output input (green) each' outputs nothing
You've set it to only read the red wire for condition checks, so it definitely won't do that. When you use "Each" mode, think of it as the combinator switching to a vector mode and evaluating the conditions for every input signal separately. In this case, since you've selected to evaluate only red ...