Added in 2.0.18

+1!

+1 this would allow for some really funny builds when combined with assembler 'Set Recipe'.

Reworded one more time, hopefully it's clear now

I don't think that says anything the title doesn't already convey, but I have put some quotes in to make it clear from more than just the capitalization that this is [Set Recipe] throughput and not Set [recipe throughput]. If you think the ingredients -> trash mechanic is a bug (unclear to me, I kno...

Note: Created dedicated topic re: throughput in viewtopic.php?t=118708, since this one's a resolved bug.

Since https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=117890 and https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=118465 included other bug reports (some inaccurate) and were closed, creating this as a dedicated topic on Set Recipe throughput. In particular whether the 2.0.11 -> 2.0.12 performance hit can be...

Just adding a +1 to pretty please choose a more throughput-friendly solution to this, I measured an over 1.5x slowdown on my liquids + intermediates smart assembler which was really crushing after having spent days optimizing it by the same amount.

(creating a dedicated topic since https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=97417 included other requests and was put in 'implemented') TL;DR Make pipes circuit-readable. What? Let the circuit network read from a pipe to get its (or its entire fluid segment's) contents. Maybe symmetric to belts an...

> I think what we need is to measure how full a segment is. Any update on this, in particular reading pipes? This would help immensely with meta-automating fluids. Adding a fluid tank to segments is usually extremely undesirable because it enormously increases their volume, and this effectively kill...