FluidFlowDirection has unexpected description

[BrainGamer_]

Types/FluidFlowDirection has a description for the "output" variant that seems like its not expected to be there.

[sarfact]

I noticed the same thing. The description for the FluidFlowDirection.output enum does seem a bit out of place, or at least not consistent with the others. Could be a leftover from an internal note or maybe a documentation oversight? It might be worth flagging it for clarification or a cleanup if it's not intended behavior.

[Therenas]

You mean the errant comma right? If so, fixed for the next release, thanks.

[BrainGamer_]

yeah I was referring to the single comma