Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
A look at the fancy new combinators: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-88
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
OMG! This is going to be AWESOME! I hope this allows for checking power levels as well, like demand/production.
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
OMG!
It will be EPIC!
It will be EPIC!
-
- Burner Inserter
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Awesome!!!
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
this is easily the best Friday Facts this week!
also.. want.. right.. now!
also.. want.. right.. now!
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
I wish there was a world download for the factorio sign that you made so that we can understand how it was done.
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
So in a pure combinator network (i.e. no smart inserters/chests etc), items are basically symbols that represent processor registers, except they can be local instead of global registers.
-
- Burner Inserter
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 6:45 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Any chance of getting a set of dummy items we can use for signals? I think it would be cleaner than using actual items.
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
I second that. It would be very confusing for the player, especially in multiplayer games, whether the item used is an actual item or just a dummy variable.Havoc_mayhem wrote:Any chance of getting a set of dummy items we can use for signals? I think it would be cleaner than using actual items.
Right now you can choose between items and numbers. You could add a third option that allows to choose letters (a, b, c, d, ...) or enter a variable name yourself that can then be used as variables.
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Well that will result in quite a lot of funny contraptions...
But I would suggest the following for the deciders:
The output should be either the input OR a static number of your choice and not restricted to simply "1".
Because I might want to output for example exactly 10 or 100 or whatever static number I want... so I'd need additional deciders or arithmetic combinators and constant combinators to achieve something that could be done by just being able to enter a simple number for the output value of a single decider.
But I would suggest the following for the deciders:
The output should be either the input OR a static number of your choice and not restricted to simply "1".
Because I might want to output for example exactly 10 or 100 or whatever static number I want... so I'd need additional deciders or arithmetic combinators and constant combinators to achieve something that could be done by just being able to enter a simple number for the output value of a single decider.
Last edited by MeduSalem on Fri May 29, 2015 7:25 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Today's friday facts gave me a headache :/
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Why can't there be graphics of this quality
For everything in the game
For everything in the game
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Patience. They'll get to it eventually.Zeblote wrote:Why can't there be graphics of this quality
For everything in the game
On the original topic: this looks really neat. Makes me look forward to the 0.12 update even more
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Because probably you don't have enough VRAM.Zeblote wrote:Why can't there be graphics of this quality
For everything in the game
Although there's planned official mod with the HD graphics. It was in FF some time ego.
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
+1Havoc_mayhem wrote:Any chance of getting a set of dummy items we can use for signals? I think it would be cleaner than using actual items.
This implementation probably works good, but also seems a bit cheap as to just "reclycling" usual items.
I imagine it could easily get unnecessarily complicated wheter items in a network are actual items or just signals.
On the other hand, this is good to see exactly what kinds of items this network is about. You can more easily assotiate something to an image of it instead of just some kind of strange pattern, letters or numbers.
I could imagine having signals with a tinted backgound. So for example, there could be placeholders like A, B, C but also just like now usual items, but all with a let's say green background.
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Robert OP, nerf pls.
Looking damn cool.
Any bets on how long until turning-complete?
Looking damn cool.
Any bets on how long until turning-complete?
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
There will be something like that. But these won't be dummy items, but special kind of signal set.Havoc_mayhem wrote:Any chance of getting a set of dummy items we can use for signals? I think it would be cleaner than using actual items.
Well, yes you need another multiplier for that, but the gui is complicated already and we wanted to keep things understandable.MeduSalem wrote:Well that will result in quite a lot of funny contraptions...
But I would suggest the following for the deciders:
The output should be either the input OR a static number of your choice and not restricted to simply "1".
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Very nice and powerful ... we can make some awesomely complex items.
Now if they game just allowed us to have a blueprint set that we could pass between games and an in game binder with pages to store them all in ......
Now if they game just allowed us to have a blueprint set that we could pass between games and an in game binder with pages to store them all in ......
-
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 11:43 pm
- Contact:
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
How often does combinators update?
Can you change the timers update rate?
Does smart inserters still work the same way?
Is the system turing complete?
Can you change the timers update rate?
Does smart inserters still work the same way?
Is the system turing complete?
Waste of bytes : P
Re: Friday Facts #88 - Combinators
Yes, this is planned. I should have mentioned this. You will be able to have special signals like "Signal 1", "Signal 2", "Signal 3" ... "Signal Blue", "Signal Green"... "Signal A", "Signal B", "Signal C" ...Havoc_mayhem wrote:Any chance of getting a set of dummy items we can use for signals? I think it would be cleaner than using actual items.
Also, in the filter you will be able to select a special "everything" signal which will have special meanings in the combinator. For example "output all the signals that are bigger than 100".