Perhaps shortened?
Still that pretty different than user expectation (expecting 3 rockets to fill 1 stack, but it requires 4 rockets).
- 11-02-2024, 22-07-25.png (92.61 KiB) Viewed 329 times
[2.0.14] Small typo with Uranium rounds magazine
-
FaustFaust
- Burner Inserter
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 7:52 pm
- Contact:
[2.0.14] Small typo with Uranium rounds magazine
The tooltip says that the rocket stack is .3, instead of .25.
Perhaps shortened?
Still that pretty different than user expectation (expecting 3 rockets to fill 1 stack, but it requires 4 rockets).
Perhaps shortened?
Still that pretty different than user expectation (expecting 3 rockets to fill 1 stack, but it requires 4 rockets).
Re: [2.0.14] Small typo with Uranium rounds magazine
That's not specific for the uranium ammo, that's just the rounding to the first significant digit.FaustFaust wrote: Sun Nov 03, 2024 3:09 am The tooltip says that the rocket stack is .3, instead of .25.
Perhaps shortened?
Still that pretty different than user expectation (expecting 3 rockets to fill 1 stack, but it requires 4 rockets).
11-02-2024, 22-07-25.png
Fulgora is the best planet. Vulcanus needs rework. Feel free to prove me wrong.
