Negative quality bonus on craft

Post your ideas and suggestions how to improve the game.

Moderator: ickputzdirwech

Post Reply
protocol_1903
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:33 pm
Contact:

Negative quality bonus on craft

Post by protocol_1903 »

TL;DR
A negative quality probability on an assembler has a chance to decrease quality on craft
What?
Slight tangent, it would be nice for any machine with a negative quality rating (say, from speed modules) to have a chance of decreasing the quality of the output item, with the same rules as normal quality. This would be a way to decrease quality of unwanted items, as well as a counterbalance to increasing the quality of base resources (plates, plastic, etc) to then craft with them normally. I could also see this being used in mods
Why?
As of now, there is no official way to reduce the quality level of an item. There is also no penalty to the negative quality bonus beyond 0%. This would change that. Even if it was a mod-only feature, it would be very useful for mods that interact with quality in new and unique ways.

On second note, how about that negative productivity bonus... but people might riot if you implement that feature :)
If you need to reach me, message me on discord.

I make qol mods. Check them out, maybe.
https://mods.factorio.com/user/protocol_1903
If you have a mod idea, I can look into it.

Walksanator
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2024 3:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Negative quality bonus on craft

Post by Walksanator »

I think bringing back the generic quality recipe would be better for "down quality" items. But from what I have heard it was removed to a exploit (no clue what exploit)

protocol_1903
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Negative quality bonus on craft

Post by protocol_1903 »

Walksanator wrote:
Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:21 am
I think bringing back the generic quality recipe would be better for "down quality" items. But from what I have heard it was removed to a exploit (no clue what exploit)
IIRC the exploit was using quality modules on a mixed quality recipe, only one of the ingredients was of epic quality, and it would have the quality bonus applied to the epic item so there was a chance for it to be legendary much higher than normal. Strange bug, but makes sense why they removed mixed quality recipes
If you need to reach me, message me on discord.

I make qol mods. Check them out, maybe.
https://mods.factorio.com/user/protocol_1903
If you have a mod idea, I can look into it.

DragoonGXG
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2024 12:14 pm
Contact:

Re: Negative quality bonus on craft

Post by DragoonGXG »

protocol_1903 wrote:
Tue Oct 29, 2024 5:27 am
IIRC the exploit was using quality modules on a mixed quality recipe, only one of the ingredients was of epic quality, and it would have the quality bonus applied to the epic item so there was a chance for it to be legendary much higher than normal. Strange bug, but makes sense why they removed mixed quality recipes
So thats why!? Sorry tangent. Had there been a mixed quality recipe base logic would be SO MUCH SIMPLER. Sorry caps...
Instead we have to build our bases 5 times to accommodate each level of quality.
My goodness I hope this wasn't the only reason there isn't a mixed quality recipe...

protocol_1903
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Negative quality bonus on craft

Post by protocol_1903 »

DragoonGXG wrote:
Tue Oct 29, 2024 12:52 pm
My goodness I hope this wasn't the only reason there isn't a mixed quality recipe...
My guess is there were performance reasons as well, it would be expensive to do the quality check every single tick/craft, especially over an entire base
If you need to reach me, message me on discord.

I make qol mods. Check them out, maybe.
https://mods.factorio.com/user/protocol_1903
If you have a mod idea, I can look into it.

Post Reply

Return to “Ideas and Suggestions”