Your math were wrong and i believe fairly obviously, if you have something you think is incorrect in the graph i proposed please feel free to explain.Xeinaemm wrote: Fri Oct 24, 2025 10:31 amYou are forgetting that math, as a language, purely focuses on abstraction and is only a tool to describe reality, not answer.The math are wrong, following your reasonning the throughput of a rail is directly proportionnal to the carrying capacity of a train, so if you were trying to make the longest train possible for whatever reason , attempting to play smart or something , then you would have to conclude that the rail has an infinite throughput. If your train could carry 8 billion coal, ( just scale loco and wagon accordingly) then it would carry 800 000 000 000 tile coal/s you can divide by 25 and 50, it will yield a gigantic number that is not more correct than the 640 coal/s unfortunatly.
We can all agree that proportions per wagon and math isn’t mathing. And trains aren't worth investing in at the endgame. In reality, you send a few-kilometer-long trains because it’s the most optimal approach, and in the current in-game state, even this approach isn’t even worth considering.
Quality should increase train wagons capacity.
Re: Quality should increase train wagons capacity.
Check out my latest mod ! It's noisy !
