[0.11.19] Blueprints are not fast-replaceable

[DaveMcW]

Factory #1

blueprint1.jpg (64.63 KiB) Viewed 3690 times

Factory #2

blueprint2.jpg (69.78 KiB) Viewed 3690 times

Placing a blueprint of Factory #2 on top of Factory #1

blueprint3.jpg (56.68 KiB) Viewed 3690 times

[Rseding91]

I don't think blueprints where ever meant to be fast replaceable?

[slpwnd]

I don't think blueprints where ever meant to be fast replaceable?

That is right. They weren't. We might implement this sometime in the future, but for now this is not a bug.

[quinor]

I've encountered similar thing while trying to place blueprint of blue assembler over existing one; sometimes it works and sometimes it does not. I suppose that is due to assembler being rotated, though it looks the same each rotation and I can't tell it.

[dee-]

I've encountered similar thing while trying to place blueprint of blue assembler over existing one; sometimes it works and sometimes it does not. I suppose that is due to assembler being rotated, though it looks the same each rotation and I can't tell it.

Yes, AMs can be rotated, resulting in conflicts when a blueprint with a differently rotated AM is placed upon it. Dunno if it's a known inconvenience?