Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?

Post all other topics which do not belong to any other category.
meowxiik
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:13 pm
Contact:

Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?

Post by meowxiik »

I looked at the wiki and on the forums and I can't find an official reason why. It makes no sense to me

- gameplay: it creates a situation, where, technically, it is more optimal to use the artillery manually instead of automatically, which is the exact opposite of the rest of factorio. Theoretically, one can use the extra manual distance for chunk discovery but I've never seen that be used or meaningfully used it myself. At a point in the game, where you have artillery, resources are already basically infinite anyway, so it shouldn't be the case of "i just need to scan chunks to find uranium" or something

- balancing: artillery & its ammo are already expensive and already basically solve the biter problem. The extra manual distance changes nothing for balancing.

- lore / immersion: if anything it would make more sense for automatic to have bigger range than manual. what's going to be more accurate, a human fat fingering a spot on a map, or a technical radar lock in?

My question is then so why? It seems to me that everyone likes this and I can't figure out why. It makes me very frustrated in situations where I end up clearing out a nest with artillery manually just to realise "why did i do this manually, I could've built a closer artillery and avoid this churn"
Rseding91
Factorio Staff
Factorio Staff
Posts: 17390
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:23 am
Contact:

Re: Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?

Post by Rseding91 »

Because I decided it sounded like fun when I implemented artillery at the engine level. It seems most people agreed with that decision.
If you want to get ahold of me I'm almost always on Discord.
eugenekay
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1244
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 2:14 am
Contact:

Re: Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?

Post by eugenekay »

meowxiik wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:31 pm - lore / immersion: if anything it would make more sense for automatic to have bigger range than manual. what's going to be more accurate, a human fat fingering a spot on a map, or a technical radar lock in?
Real-world Artillery systems employ a forward deployed observer for targeting and corrections when firing over-the-horizon. Automatic target selection and elimination is the realm of science fiction current drone-based AI systems.
meowxiik
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?

Post by meowxiik »

Rseding91 wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:45 pm Because I decided it sounded like fun when I implemented artillery at the engine level. It seems most people agreed with that decision.
Fair enough!
InUniverse
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 12:30 pm
Contact:

Re: Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?

Post by InUniverse »

If the manual range was the same size as the automatic range, then manual targeting would be basically useless, right? Anything that you could manually target would just get shelled out automatically if you left it to its own devices.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”