I looked at the wiki and on the forums and I can't find an official reason why. It makes no sense to me
- gameplay: it creates a situation, where, technically, it is more optimal to use the artillery manually instead of automatically, which is the exact opposite of the rest of factorio. Theoretically, one can use the extra manual distance for chunk discovery but I've never seen that be used or meaningfully used it myself. At a point in the game, where you have artillery, resources are already basically infinite anyway, so it shouldn't be the case of "i just need to scan chunks to find uranium" or something
- balancing: artillery & its ammo are already expensive and already basically solve the biter problem. The extra manual distance changes nothing for balancing.
- lore / immersion: if anything it would make more sense for automatic to have bigger range than manual. what's going to be more accurate, a human fat fingering a spot on a map, or a technical radar lock in?
My question is then so why? It seems to me that everyone likes this and I can't figure out why. It makes me very frustrated in situations where I end up clearing out a nest with artillery manually just to realise "why did i do this manually, I could've built a closer artillery and avoid this churn"
Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?
-
meowxiik
- Manual Inserter

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:13 pm
- Contact:
-
Rseding91
- Factorio Staff

- Posts: 17390
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:23 am
- Contact:
Re: Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?
Because I decided it sounded like fun when I implemented artillery at the engine level. It seems most people agreed with that decision.
If you want to get ahold of me I'm almost always on Discord.
-
eugenekay
- Smart Inserter

- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 2:14 am
- Contact:
Re: Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?
Real-world Artillery systems employ a forward deployed observer for targeting and corrections when firing over-the-horizon. Automatic target selection and elimination is the realm ofmeowxiik wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:31 pm - lore / immersion: if anything it would make more sense for automatic to have bigger range than manual. what's going to be more accurate, a human fat fingering a spot on a map, or a technical radar lock in?
-
meowxiik
- Manual Inserter

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?
Fair enough!Rseding91 wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2026 5:45 pm Because I decided it sounded like fun when I implemented artillery at the engine level. It seems most people agreed with that decision.
-
InUniverse
- Inserter

- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 12:30 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why does the artillery have bigger manual range?
If the manual range was the same size as the automatic range, then manual targeting would be basically useless, right? Anything that you could manually target would just get shelled out automatically if you left it to its own devices.