Hello!
I've been playing 2.1 since it came out and i saw and experienced the changes to biter expansion sizes and personally found them incredibly overtuned and it made me think about what this change is meant to accomplish or imply. I mainly was thinking about this because 2.1 specifically besides the biters had other changes (such as the non-negotiable removal of Space Casinos) that were ... strange? oddly against the idea of Factorio? as in, it being a sandbox where your solutions are your expressions translated into gameplay. Space Age in general strayed away from this IMO already, but they continued this trend in this latest update.
But to go back to biters, for example my go to method of destroying expansions in the pre-tank early game is driving around with a car and taking care of the minor popups with guns and grenades, quick and easy, no hassle, in my mind it fits the balance of player power and threat levels faced on default settings. However, these giant nests that pretty much immediately just emerge from nowhere are not exactly very favourable for this gameplay, so it made me wonder did they intend to exactly limit this behaviour? Or perhaps did they intend to increase the use of turret / flamer turret creep behind walls as to be intended? Because a 450 HP flimsy car against a swarm of biters and worms that i only saw previously by the time i was about to leave to another planet feels unbalanced. However i am just one player among many and consider myself relatively maleable, maybe my experiences are not universal, this particular change is just a matter of getting used to (or balance, i've also read they are actively doing that), which is why i'd be glad to read insights and thoughts from you!
Biter expansion changes and it's implications
-
ProMeTheus112
- Burner Inserter
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2026 2:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Biter expansion changes and it's implications
For me so far my opinion of the expansion changes is positive, I've been playing only 1 DWM game since 2.1, and I think :
• It makes the game more difficult, and I like it because before this change I would get to a point where I was able to set up a large perimeter of defenses securing a good bunch of ressources far enough from the biters that I could start ignoring them until the very late game, and this from the blue science phase~ which was ok but now the game feels more dynamic before I would reach that point and most likely also after I would reach it.
• It makes producing smaller defense points in the early game and placing them down more valuable, and simply clearing a existing biter base a more difficult choice to consider as the biters can then re-expand bigger in that area. You also may want to be now more active in spotting and countering biter expansions early on but you also have the choice how much you want to do that or not.
• In the mid-late game investing more heavily into military is valuable to become able to cleanly stop expansion groups.
• I imagine default settings must play nicer, because in my opinion it was a bit too easy to win a game while barely engaging with biters after clearing a few key closer nests in the early game (at least in vanilla).
• As an added bonus because the expansions are so big now, they cause the biters to evolve faster if you clear them because clearing these big expansions is killing a lot of spawners, so that's an extra layer of difficulty there which I think seems to work well in DWM and I'm sure it makes evolution threat better in default settings too. I can also see those situations where you fight swarms of small biters early on like in the menu screen happen more naturally in default settings now for example.
TLDR before now, biter expansions were small and not a big threat themselves, more of an "annoyance" to clear every now and then. Now these expansions are big so they are a real threat to consider, and even an expansion group running into your defense can cause issues so you need to invest more in military and perhaps place more stuff at some key points on the map which is nice. Expanding your control area is harder. Surviving early on may be harder.
Note: I barely use flame turrets, I know they're good at clearing big attacks at a wall but I don't setup my factory like that very much, I rely more on key points on map with gun + laser turrets + mines, + sometimes walls. But now with an opportunity I would probably use flame turrets more.
• It makes the game more difficult, and I like it because before this change I would get to a point where I was able to set up a large perimeter of defenses securing a good bunch of ressources far enough from the biters that I could start ignoring them until the very late game, and this from the blue science phase~ which was ok but now the game feels more dynamic before I would reach that point and most likely also after I would reach it.
• It makes producing smaller defense points in the early game and placing them down more valuable, and simply clearing a existing biter base a more difficult choice to consider as the biters can then re-expand bigger in that area. You also may want to be now more active in spotting and countering biter expansions early on but you also have the choice how much you want to do that or not.
• In the mid-late game investing more heavily into military is valuable to become able to cleanly stop expansion groups.
• I imagine default settings must play nicer, because in my opinion it was a bit too easy to win a game while barely engaging with biters after clearing a few key closer nests in the early game (at least in vanilla).
• As an added bonus because the expansions are so big now, they cause the biters to evolve faster if you clear them because clearing these big expansions is killing a lot of spawners, so that's an extra layer of difficulty there which I think seems to work well in DWM and I'm sure it makes evolution threat better in default settings too. I can also see those situations where you fight swarms of small biters early on like in the menu screen happen more naturally in default settings now for example.
TLDR before now, biter expansions were small and not a big threat themselves, more of an "annoyance" to clear every now and then. Now these expansions are big so they are a real threat to consider, and even an expansion group running into your defense can cause issues so you need to invest more in military and perhaps place more stuff at some key points on the map which is nice. Expanding your control area is harder. Surviving early on may be harder.
Note: I barely use flame turrets, I know they're good at clearing big attacks at a wall but I don't setup my factory like that very much, I rely more on key points on map with gun + laser turrets + mines, + sometimes walls. But now with an opportunity I would probably use flame turrets more.
-
DSL-Exodus
- Burner Inserter
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2026 6:21 am
- Contact:
Re: Biter expansion changes and it's implications
There are too many people who started playing in 2.0 and think the weak biters are the baseline.
The reason I say that is because relatively speaking, massive nerfs happened to the biters and related mechanics. Pollution consumption of blocks/terrain was increased, majorly affecting attacks and expansion. Ammo was also made cheaper in 2.0. There was a long standing bug in relation to biter expansion that has been fixed. The ammo thing was indirect, supposed to help with copper consumption rather than make ammo cheaper. These are just direct things, rather than indirect like remote tank control etc.
Gleba also had bugged expansion and it has luckily been fixed.
In my experience the biters are closer to what they were pre 2.0 and that's how they should be(more difficult). They were put in the game to be a challenge after all, people who don't like them can disable or tweak them. The real core of the conversation boils down to "how the game should be played" and conversations surrounding "achievements". If you can't play with the biters on, then you don't deserve the achievements. In my opinion, the biter difficulty should match 1.0 or be slightly higher for Space Age(considering you have the safety of other planets when playing Space Age DLC). There were no major content additions that justify an easier biter experience, if anything the contrary(remote tank control for example, big fancy shock turrets for behemoth biters in SA, SA quality defences).
Just as long as its not the lobotomized biters we've seen in 2.0 ever since the tile pollution consumption changes, in combination with the cheaper ammo and expansion bug.
For context I have been playing since 2017, on all kinds of worlds, including extreme death worlds, so I noticed the big nerfs to biters immediately, the entire reason I made a forum account was to report a bug in relation to enemy mechanics(pentapod expansion problem).
The reason I say that is because relatively speaking, massive nerfs happened to the biters and related mechanics. Pollution consumption of blocks/terrain was increased, majorly affecting attacks and expansion. Ammo was also made cheaper in 2.0. There was a long standing bug in relation to biter expansion that has been fixed. The ammo thing was indirect, supposed to help with copper consumption rather than make ammo cheaper. These are just direct things, rather than indirect like remote tank control etc.
Gleba also had bugged expansion and it has luckily been fixed.
In my experience the biters are closer to what they were pre 2.0 and that's how they should be(more difficult). They were put in the game to be a challenge after all, people who don't like them can disable or tweak them. The real core of the conversation boils down to "how the game should be played" and conversations surrounding "achievements". If you can't play with the biters on, then you don't deserve the achievements. In my opinion, the biter difficulty should match 1.0 or be slightly higher for Space Age(considering you have the safety of other planets when playing Space Age DLC). There were no major content additions that justify an easier biter experience, if anything the contrary(remote tank control for example, big fancy shock turrets for behemoth biters in SA, SA quality defences).
Just as long as its not the lobotomized biters we've seen in 2.0 ever since the tile pollution consumption changes, in combination with the cheaper ammo and expansion bug.
For context I have been playing since 2017, on all kinds of worlds, including extreme death worlds, so I noticed the big nerfs to biters immediately, the entire reason I made a forum account was to report a bug in relation to enemy mechanics(pentapod expansion problem).
Re: Biter expansion changes and it's implications
It's very easy to deal with biters. Open your game to multiplayer and we can show you.