"Read research" as additional output in research labs

Ideas that are too old (too many things have changed since) and ones which won't be implemented for certain reasons or if there are obviously better suggestions.

Moderator: ickputzdirwech

Eiermann
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:27 am
Contact:

"Read research" as additional output in research labs

Post by Eiermann »

TL;DR
Allow labs to output all currently available research technologies and their levels via the circuit network.
What?
Add a circuit network output to the new 2.1 lab that reports every currently available research.

For each available technology, the lab would output:

The technology's signal/icon.
Its current research level (or 1 for non-repeatable technologies).

Example:
06-26-2026, 00-44-07.png
06-26-2026, 00-44-07.png (57.3 KiB) Viewed 79 times
Why?
This would make it possible to build more advanced research automation using the circuit network.

Currently, circuit logic can only react to the active research, making it difficult to implement more sophisticated decision-making. Being able to read all available research options would allow players to automatically choose the next technology based on custom priorities, available resources, or other circuit conditions instead of relying on simple sequential logic.
The-Zee-System
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: "Read research" as additional output in research labs

Post by The-Zee-System »

+1 this so i can make it automated with research
Rseding91
Factorio Staff
Factorio Staff
Posts: 17001
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:23 am
Contact:

Re: "Read research" as additional output in research labs

Post by Rseding91 »

This was discussed internally at the time and we ended up rejecting it. Signals do not support technologies and it simply over complicated things to have another signal type with potentially overlapping icons and names.
If you want to get ahold of me I'm almost always on Discord.
Post Reply

Return to “Outdated/Not implemented”