Vanilla tooltips need a wider range of order values to make custom tooltips easier to put in the right place.

Place to ask discuss and request the modding support of Factorio. Don't request mods here.
MeteorSwarm
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2025 10:49 pm
Contact:

Vanilla tooltips need a wider range of order values to make custom tooltips easier to put in the right place.

Post by MeteorSwarm »

I am attempting to add a custom tooltip to planets indicating a rocket part multiplier value. I want this multiplier to be next to the robot energy multiplier, but since vanilla tooltips all seem to have an order of 100, setting the order to 100 places the tooltip before every other tooltip, and setting the order to 101 places the tooltip after every other tooltip. Custom tooltips would be a lot more customizable if vanilla tooltips were given a wider range of order values so that custom tooltips could fit in between them.
Rocket part multiplier tooltip, order = 100
Rocket part multiplier tooltip, order = 100
06-15-2026, 11-24-03.png (225.6 KiB) Viewed 68 times
Rocket part multiplier tooltip, order = 101
Rocket part multiplier tooltip, order = 101
06-15-2026, 11-28-17.png (230.15 KiB) Viewed 68 times
Bilka
Factorio Staff
Factorio Staff
Posts: 3773
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: Vanilla tooltips need a wider range of order values to make custom tooltips easier to put in the right place.

Post by Bilka »

Could your specific usecase be solved with making a full new SurfacePropertyPrototype instead of only modifying the tooltip?
I'm an admin over at https://wiki.factorio.com. Feel free to contact me if there's anything wrong (or right) with it.
MeteorSwarm
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2025 10:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Vanilla tooltips need a wider range of order values to make custom tooltips easier to put in the right place.

Post by MeteorSwarm »

Bilka wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 6:47 pm Could your specific usecase be solved with making a full new SurfacePropertyPrototype instead of only modifying the tooltip?
Yes, that would be a solution to my problem, but because I don't consider this value a surface property, doing that would be a hack that I'd prefer to avoid.
Post Reply

Return to “Modding interface requests”