No it's perfectly fine, there is no need to use the quality inserter, it's a waste of ressources , you can try the blueprint for yourself instead of making incorrect predictioncoffee-factorio wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 4:44 am Those are standard bulk inserters. It will short feed.
It's only a picture you posted, no blueprint but i can still see your version is using circuits, whereas i found it's not necessary and the thread is in circuit-free solution
I wanted to make sure it was what you meant to post; because posting the wrong BP has happened to mequyxkh wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 4:40 amYeah, that's fair, it does at least settle on that nifty rate and consume its input near-as-dammit exactly, I wasn't trying for either of those results and the pair of coincidences still tickles my fancy, that's all there really was to that. I did have to do some minor tweaks to get it all stabilized, it's not an exact twinning.
maybe "disappointed" wasn't the proper word, cuz now i see coffee's picture and i'm "disappointed" at least you provided a blueprint i could study to try and squeeze the beacons a little more But mmmPI. Science. Data! STATISTICS!mmmPI wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 9:03 amNo it's perfectly fine, there is no need to use the quality inserter, it's a waste of ressources , you can try the blueprint for yourself instead of making incorrect predictioncoffee-factorio wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 4:44 am Those are standard bulk inserters. It will short feed.
Your version where you reverse the feeding belt for some reasons maybe x), not mine :
Not that there is a need to change anything for vanilla it works just finemmmPI wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 12:05 am You can use (filtered) car to make it faster for a centrifuge to loop the ouput back into the input compared to belt.
with car.jpg
The bp comes with 3 tiled , and i think similar to quyxkh for the uranium input.
There's room for another car in case for fancier logic
That's not the smallest possible and it's not circuit free thoughSaboteurKiev wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 1:27 pm Have small dashboard with reactor temp, water and steam
I made sure to light it appropriately. The system is compact, so it may be replicated and optimized.mmmPI wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 2:51 pm
Not that there is a need to change anything for vanilla it works just fine
Whereas in your version your broke this :
do not break and complain.jpg
Then you ranked a that broken copy of my blueprint, so i would say your data statistics are not relevant, i think i found out why , but maybe there are other things.
.So I'm in a tough spot. Because it is a mechanical optimization board. So that means to me, no combinators and wires with conditions set are a gray area.SaboteurKiev wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 1:27 pm Support my 10-reactors setup easily (actually 90%+ of time this setup is sleeping)
Priority Uranium-238 from depleted fuel cells
Have small dashboard with reactor temp, water and steam
No it is not , can't you see it despite the arrows ? :coffee-factorio wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 4:49 pm The above is your build rotated 45 degrees. If rotation by 45 degrees breaks a blueprint... I have questions about the quality of the build
As you can see, the spike from throwing 100 u235 in does not statistically change the output capability of your build. Reversing the belt direction increases items per minute by 2.mmmPI wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 5:00 pm There may be other thing that you modified without noticing you were breaking the blueprint, this is only what i can see from the picture, i can already see you tested a bad version x)
I can't tell what else you have modified on the blueprint to break it , it could be you messed with the stacksize, or misplaced the car so the hitbox doesn't connect, using an inserter to feed the input belt instead the way it was done on the blueprint, who knows ^^ but i'm confident it's on your end as in case you didn't notice someone else confirmed it was working fine and i tested on multiplayer , the centrifuge are functionning 100% of time with no downtime.
nice ! it is more compactquyxkh wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 6:05 pm Pretty happy with this POC, anybody needs more '235 fr can extend it easily.
You've got the winning tile. There's 4 input scenarios I can put in it that are only equivalent to what you have. Setting a filter makes maybe a 1-2 ipm difference?quyxkh wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 6:05 pm Pretty happy with this POC, anybody needs more '235 fr can extend it easily.
screenshot-tick-85442133.png
