- Discord_KAUEJfoYJq.png (1.37 MiB) Viewed 125 times
- Discord_yGw95AZg5g.png (1.08 MiB) Viewed 125 times
- Discord_1PDX3jjiQA.png (998.33 KiB) Viewed 125 times
Crusher doesn't show energy reduction with Beacon Modules
-
KatherineOfSky
- Fast Inserter
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 7:54 pm
- Contact:
Crusher doesn't show energy reduction with Beacon Modules
Tested with this setup on a space platform:
For whatever reason, one of the crushers shows the energy reduction through efficiency modules, and the other doesn't...
I was testing this in the editor.
Tutorials, wild playthroughs, and more! https://www.youtube.com/@KatherineOfSky
Re: Crusher doesn't show energy reduction with Beacon Modules
Not a bug.
Crusher below a beacon has 2 speed-modules-2 inside that give it 2x +60% consumption (total of +120%) while beacon has 2 efficiency-modules-2 with 2x -40% consumption (total of -80%, but due to beacon's distribution effectivity of 1.5, effect seen by crusher is -120%). That crusher has 0% effect applied to the energy consumption and so there is no effect visible.
Crusher to the left of a beacon has only 1x efficiency-module-2 (and 1 speed-module-2 which is planned to be inserted, it is not there yet). This means this crusher sees total of -120% consumption reduction from beacon and -40% consumption reduction from module inside which gets clamped at -80% consumption.
All tooltips are correct.
Crusher below a beacon has 2 speed-modules-2 inside that give it 2x +60% consumption (total of +120%) while beacon has 2 efficiency-modules-2 with 2x -40% consumption (total of -80%, but due to beacon's distribution effectivity of 1.5, effect seen by crusher is -120%). That crusher has 0% effect applied to the energy consumption and so there is no effect visible.
Crusher to the left of a beacon has only 1x efficiency-module-2 (and 1 speed-module-2 which is planned to be inserted, it is not there yet). This means this crusher sees total of -120% consumption reduction from beacon and -40% consumption reduction from module inside which gets clamped at -80% consumption.
All tooltips are correct.