Sideloading onto a belt takes priority and stops main line

Things that has been reported already before.
ordon1313
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:22 pm
Contact:

Sideloading onto a belt takes priority and stops main line

Post by ordon1313 »

See: https://www.reddit.com/r/factorio/comme ... his_a_bug/ for original post on reddit.

Hi
I noticed a bug when sideloading on a belt can halt items already on that belt.
I believe this is unexpected. I always though items already on belt have priority over sideloaded.

I attached a video where red circuits take priority over green already on the belt.

See also attached save file with limited setup that also reproduce this bug.
Thanks
Attachments
factorio_bug_report.zip
save file
(1.5 MiB) Downloaded 29 times
clip_1,754,829,508,428.mp4
Reproduced bug
(24.34 MiB) Downloaded 30 times
Jap2.0
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 2538
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Sideloading onto a belt takes priority and stops main line

Post by Jap2.0 »

No change in belt speeds in this one, interestingly. I'm curious what the transport lines look like.
There are 10 types of people: those who get this joke and those who don't.
Loewchen
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 10303
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Sideloading onto a belt takes priority and stops main line

Post by Loewchen »

Jap2.0 wrote: Sun Aug 10, 2025 3:36 pm No change in belt speeds in this one, interestingly. I'm curious what the transport lines look like.
That was never relevant, this is purely dictated by the update order.
Jap2.0
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 2538
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Sideloading onto a belt takes priority and stops main line

Post by Jap2.0 »

Loewchen wrote: Sun Aug 10, 2025 3:40 pm
Jap2.0 wrote: Sun Aug 10, 2025 3:36 pm No change in belt speeds in this one, interestingly. I'm curious what the transport lines look like.
That was never relevant, this is purely dictated by the update order.
My understanding (which could very well be wrong, and often is) was that an entire segment is updated at once, so what matters is the update order of segments and the only way sideloading could have priority is if there was a break in segments where sideloading is happening. In the linked report, that was because of the difference in speeds. Here... I don't know why there's a break, but there is. To be honest, looking around my base I have very little idea why transport lines merge/split how they do.

But I guess that still falls under "no guarantee which order belts are updated in".
There are 10 types of people: those who get this joke and those who don't.
Loewchen
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 10303
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Sideloading onto a belt takes priority and stops main line

Post by Loewchen »

Jap2.0 wrote: Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:37 pm In the linked report, that was because of the difference in speeds. Here... I don't know why there's a break, but there is. To be honest, looking around my base I have very little idea why transport lines merge/split how they do.
Ah, I got the link from another duplicate without speed difference, but yes, they are all considered the same issue.
Post Reply

Return to “Duplicates”