I use BIOLAB. That is not what I am trying to say.
Compare the first and second images with the third image. What I am claiming is that the all-time science counts are less than the 250h and 1000h science counts added in 2.0. Common sense dictates that these should match.
Thanks for the report. Issue is now fixed for 2.0.25. It was a type mismatch in one place: science progress was reported every tick as a fractional value which item production statistics were accidentally able to store for normal time ranges however the total range uses counter that is an integer and so if got a science output less than "1" per tick, it was effectively clamped to 0 and not reported. In 2.0.25 i made this logic slightly smarter as it waits until 1 unit of science is accumulated and then it reports that to flow statistics in order for the total counter to get updated correctly.
Thanks for the fix.
So the ALL-TIME count is a little less than actual number. I understood.
In my save, the error in tallying the first 1000 hours will be ignored in time.