Decider combinator should have ability to output "constant"
Moderator: ickputzdirwech
Decider combinator should have ability to output "constant"
Before there was technicaly imposible to make this so the only way was use decider + arithmetic combinators, but now it is technicaly possible to make that circuit, but that create readibility problem
-
- Manual Inserter
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 9:43 pm
- Contact:
Re: Decider combinator should have ability to output "constant"
100% agreed, let us set a value.
Re: Decider combinator should have ability to output "constant"
Searched a forum before suggesting exactly this.
Fully agreed, it should be implemented, even though there is a hack to solve the problem.
Fully agreed, it should be implemented, even though there is a hack to solve the problem.
Re: Decider combinator should have ability to output "constant"
This is a miss across the board for all circuit devices, not just decider combinators. I never understood why the only choices are "input count" or 1. If one of the choices is going to be a constant, let us pick the constant.
- AileTheAlien
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 4:30 pm
- Contact:
Re: Decider combinator should have ability to output "constant"
I think it's because you can output constants with a constant combinator, and then use a decider combinator to choose the values from the constant combinator instead of the non-constant signals from the other combinator(s).
Re: Decider combinator should have ability to output "constant"
That's true, but it's extra circuitry and wires that clutter things up. It can already output a constant value anyway... so it's hard to see what the downsides would be to making it configurable.AileTheAlien wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 3:55 am I think it's because you can output constants with a constant combinator, and then use a decider combinator to choose the values from the constant combinator instead of the non-constant signals from the other combinator(s).
Maybe the devs want us to have messy circuits, but most of the changes in 2.0 were added from a desire to do just the opposite. I get not wanting to make combinators so powerful that huge circuits can be reduced to a single combinator with complex branching conditions, but this request is pretty far from that.
Re: Decider combinator should have ability to output "constant"
/sign
I would also like to see the ability to change the sign of a number on outputs. Lets ban all those arithmetic combinators 'Each * -1'
I would also like to see the ability to change the sign of a number on outputs. Lets ban all those arithmetic combinators 'Each * -1'