[2.0.21] Parameterized blueprint sets fluid requests and parameters

Things that has been reported already before.
Xentrice
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:55 am
Contact:

[2.0.21] Parameterized blueprint sets fluid requests and parameters

Post by Xentrice »

Dear Devs,

1. setting a parameterized blueprint to autofill the requests of a requester chest sets fluid requests if the recipe contains any.

2. if the parameterized blueprint containts a fixed value as a request, and the same item gets requested again by parameter, the parameter is not converted upon pasting and the request is the parameter itself. The fixed request stays as is.
factorio.png
factorio.png (64.11 KiB) Viewed 275 times
Setting this blueprint to craft pentapod eggs demonstrates both behaviors. Unsure if 1. really constitutes a bug, 2. could surely be solved smoother, maybe by combining the requests in this case?



Thank you for your work!
Muche
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2017 6:20 pm
Contact:

Re: [2.0.21] Parameterized blueprint sets fluid requests and parameters

Post by Muche »

Welcome to the forum, and thank you for the report.

Fluid request is correct, see e.g. 118604 Requester chests can request fluids using parameterized blueprints / 121100 Parameterized blueprint can set fluids in requester chest.

I believe the second one is caused by the limitation of a logistic group containing only unique signals, i.e. each signal can be listed at most once.
It looks like the fixed-amount-nutrients got set first, then trying to add parameter-nutrients got rejected/failed due to uniqueness.

Listing nutrients in their own section might be the intended solution:
Xentrice
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:55 am
Contact:

Re: [2.0.21] Parameterized blueprint sets fluid requests and parameters

Post by Xentrice »

Thank you for the reply!
My quick search did not turn up anything regarding the fluids.

Listing nutrients in their own section does indeed work as intended and adds up both requests. Thank you for the quick solution!

I suppose this can be marked not a bug, unless the rejection due to uniqueness is seen as such.

Best regards!
Post Reply

Return to “Duplicates”