2.0 Intersection Compendium
2.0 Intersection Compendium
This post was made because I had a working 2.0 intersection tester. as the main test thread has updated theirs, please go and use that one
Last edited by TBTerra2 on Thu Oct 24, 2024 7:17 pm, edited 23 times in total.
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
[reserved for intersections with non-standard train sizes]
-
LuziferSenpai
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:06 am
- Contact:
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
You can test these designs: viewtopic.php?f=194&t=115929
There are 2x 3-way and 2x 4-way junctions inside.
There are 2x 3-way and 2x 4-way junctions inside.
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
Cube
RHD
LHD
Image
RHD
LHD
Last edited by DaveMcW on Tue Oct 22, 2024 11:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
LuziferSenpai wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2024 5:21 pm You can test these designs: viewtopic.php?f=194&t=115929
There are 2x 3-way and 2x 4-way junctions inside.
Idealy people can test these themseves, but given the less than perfect tester (an hour and 20min was not enough time to port the mod), ill do these for you
LuziferSenpai:
3way flyover: a respectable score of 58
3way half cloverfeild: a less impressive but still reasonable score of 45
4way advanced roundabout: deadlocks as the roundabout does not use chain signals
4way : a very nice score of 79, however '4way' is to generic a name for the list, what would you like it to be called? i see its based of a turbine interchange
DaveMcW:
Cube: really showing the KISS design principles, and it works, with scores of 90.7/90.9 for RHD/LHD respectivly
I will add all the successful intersections to the main post shortly
and these tests made me realize that the tester needs better handedness detection for chunk aligned intersections and those with very narrow track spacing (which will be more of a thing in 2.0)
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
to add one of my own designs to the list I present the streamline flyover 3-way
its rather wide as a whole, but narrow in profile. I could make it smaller but that would involve making it manual driving un-friendly, or changing the rail spacing.
it gets a score of 83.6 which is around the same as the best 2lane 3 way buffered intersection from 1.1
i suspect the 2lane 3way limit for score is around 90, with the 2lane 4way limit around 115-120
its rather wide as a whole, but narrow in profile. I could make it smaller but that would involve making it manual driving un-friendly, or changing the rail spacing.
it gets a score of 83.6 which is around the same as the best 2lane 3 way buffered intersection from 1.1
i suspect the 2lane 3way limit for score is around 90, with the 2lane 4way limit around 115-120
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
Bocian2 has published some of his ideas for elevated rail interchanges in this Reddit post.
I created blueprints for some of his Celtic Knot designs.
Celtic Knot (Variant A)
LHD
Celtic Knot (Variant B)
LHD
I created blueprints for some of his Celtic Knot designs.
Celtic Knot (Variant A)
Image
RHD LHD
Celtic Knot (Variant B)
Image
RHD LHD
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
Variant A is near identical to the design from LuziferSenpai, but Variant B is both different and pretty good with a score of 89 for RHD and 86 for LHDTiMatic wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 2:53 pm Bocian2 has published some of his ideas for elevated rail interchanges in this Reddit post.
I created blueprints for some of his Celtic Knot designs.
Celtic Knot (Variant A)
RHD
LHD
Celtic Knot (Variant B)
RHD
LHD
as an added note: i went and tried to make the intersection from FFF417
Im not 100% sure on the north and south outputs as we cant see them so this is just what i got to work
as the largest intersection tested and the first 4 lane design, it unsurprisingly did rather well. what i was not expecting was a score of 209
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
EDIT: Added stats.
Here's a 76x64 tile 2-rail-space intersection, very directly based on boskid's best-in-class submission to our communal competitive efforts on Discord about a year ago.
With no buffers inside:
With buffers for 7-car trains (it fits 2x 7-car buffers or 3x 5-car buffers):
Here's a 76x64 tile 2-rail-space intersection, very directly based on boskid's best-in-class submission to our communal competitive efforts on Discord about a year ago.
With no buffers inside:
- 10-23-2024, 15-20-02.png (38.4 KiB) Viewed 16995 times
- 10-23-2024, 15-49-16.png (39.06 KiB) Viewed 16995 times
- 10-22-2024, 17-04-07.png (857.28 KiB) Viewed 21446 times
Last edited by sparr on Wed Oct 23, 2024 8:06 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
Here is a 3-way intersection which is compact (72x40) but requires 5 ramps. It's like half of the 4-way Cube intersection with some space optimizations.
LHD variant
RHD variant
LHD variant
- 3-way-lhd.jpg (457 KiB) Viewed 21386 times
RHD variant
- 3-way-rhd.jpg (479.75 KiB) Viewed 21386 times
Last edited by TiMatic on Thu Oct 24, 2024 3:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
ruspartisan
- Burner Inserter
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
Some sort of merge between Star intersection from OpenTTD and whirpool intersection I used before. Call it whatever you want.
- Attachments
-
- image_2024-10-23_01-56-00.png (1.09 MiB) Viewed 21376 times
Last edited by ruspartisan on Wed Oct 23, 2024 6:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
Here's my current best take on a compact 3-way
- 10-22-2024, 18-24-53.png (385.22 KiB) Viewed 21340 times
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
zero space non-elevated intersection, 40x40 tiles
- 10-22-2024, 18-59-06.png (780.93 KiB) Viewed 21293 times
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
I have added ruspartisan's design as they had a test results screenshot
can other people also use the actual tester
I will eventually go though all the designs submitted, but priority will be given to those that have already been shown to work in the tester
can other people also use the actual tester
I will eventually go though all the designs submitted, but priority will be given to those that have already been shown to work in the tester
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
I'll try to submit some bug reports soon to get the tester working with more intersections.
-
ruspartisan
- Burner Inserter
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
Simple intersection. Fits into a chunk (but needs buffers after the intersection). Should be fine for non-megabase stages of the game. At last we can make this one, previously impossible because signals could not be placed where needed/
- Attachments
-
- simple_intersection.png (1.09 MiB) Viewed 20616 times
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
34x34 one rail spacing
- 10-23-2024, 07-25-20.png (735.99 KiB) Viewed 19579 times
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
Designed to be cheap to build and compact for first junctions with elevated rails, 94x86 footprint, 2 tiles spacing.
- minimalistic cloverleaf 2 tile spacing.png (343.32 KiB) Viewed 19477 times
-
ruspartisan
- Burner Inserter
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2.0 Intersection Compendium
may depend on train size, i haven't tested train that are longer than the junction, i don't see how it could though, if you have room for train outside the junctions they would always clear it seem to me.