Include Train Fuel Info into Train Stops

Post your ideas and suggestions how to improve the game.

Moderator: ickputzdirwech

Koub
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 7955
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:54 am
Contact:

Re: Include Train Fuel Info into Train Stops

Post by Koub »

[Koub] @mmmPI and mrvn : please don't turn this thread into another battleground between you two, or I'll have to crack down.
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
mmmPI
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 4286
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Include Train Fuel Info into Train Stops

Post by mmmPI »

Arguing when there is no reason is pointless i agree.

I read that the suggestion was pointless, I disagree hence i argue because that's rude and an opinion i don't share.

There is no reason to consider every different locomotive to check for fuel. It's not fragile same as loading cargo wagon is not fragile. You don't end up with a train with 0 cargon in a wagon and another filled up. You can but it doesn't have to be this way. You as player are free to do what you want. No reason to consider things differently for locomotive and ending up in a situation where some of your locomotives are fed and not others.

The thing can happen at the moment already. It almost never happen, and if it does it's because you did something wrong. Like adding a useless feature in a mod and not utilizing that feature properly.

The game is not broken because you can't read fuel value. Adding fuel in train schedule value won't break the game you dont have to use it. How come things are going to be more fragile ? It's going to stay the same at worst. Not more fragile that is ridiculous. Why would you end up with train having greatly reduced acceleration then and not now ? Only if you don't properly use the feature.

I understand 2) is your argument, but it is not a convincing argument imo. It just state "things are going to be fragile otherwise".

This is not true same as saying using a refuel train was generating extra traffic from them compared to using a refuel station.

Same as saying the suggestion is pointless because it would require dynamic schedule. It's not true. One can have that opinion, but it's just a 1-person personnal opinion.

And all of this is a needless discussion about the 2nd part of the suggestion that doesn't even need to exist due the 1rst part answering the problem already.
Post Reply

Return to “Ideas and Suggestions”