JoshLittle wrote:n9103 wrote:Definitely coming off a bit caustic there JL.Also, neither of those belts in the pics is actually balanced, they're just resistant to overflow on one of the sides....
I'm not really interested in the balance of the left belt vs the right belt in this case. It's the left side of the belt vs the right.
What's going on in the save is more coincidence than intention, and it's not resilient to influences on either side. The ore happens to be arriving in the right ratios on the sides of the belt. If all your miners that are putting ore on the left hand side of the belt dry up, that left hand side will dry up the whole way down.
But something that that setup is accomplishing: Increased throughput by multiplexing through multiple slow belts, rather than a single fast one. It's not particularly called for, since the entirety of the up and down stream sides aren't fast belts or better, but it's a more cost efficient belt method for longer distances.