Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post all other topics which do not belong to any other category.
User avatar
eradicator
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 5207
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by eradicator »

DaveMcW wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2019 2:41 pm
eradicator wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2019 4:00 amAnd if drain is even calculated seperatedly at all it is probably consumed before dynamic consumption
Nope. Test it with 2 assembling-machine-2 and 5 solar panels, they run at full speed and don't pay any drain.
Yes. Tested it with one AM3 and an EEI producing 6458J/t (i.e 387.48kW) and the tooltip gets a yellow energy bar. Projected consumption of AM3 is 375+12.5=387.5, thus in my test drain is required for 100% production. At 6459J/t (i.e. +1J/t) the bar turns green as expected.

Code: Select all

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
Last edited by eradicator on Thu Aug 08, 2019 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Author of: Belt Planner, Hand Crank Generator, Screenshot Maker, /sudo and more.
Mod support languages: 日本語, Deutsch, English
My code in the post above is dedicated to the public domain under CC0.
User avatar
DaveMcW
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 11:06 am
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by DaveMcW »

The energy bar is a lie, look at production speed.
User avatar
eradicator
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 5207
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by eradicator »

DaveMcW wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2019 2:58 pm The energy bar is a lie, look at production speed.
Well meh. It even says "low power" in the status. But according to the statistics produces at full speed with 6250J/t. If i was in the mood i'd post a bugreport.

Gonna be more difficult to harvest this for inserters with their wavy consumption though.
Author of: Belt Planner, Hand Crank Generator, Screenshot Maker, /sudo and more.
Mod support languages: 日本語, Deutsch, English
My code in the post above is dedicated to the public domain under CC0.
nog
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 12:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by nog »

We could sky rocket the challenge by using nuclear fuel, we should reach about 8.3 GW (quick and dirty calculations, including drills consumption and everything intermediate) but with an insane amount of centrifuge to produce as much as 548.26 nuclear fuel per minute.
User avatar
TruePikachu
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 978
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by TruePikachu »

How are you going to do that without a uranium input though?
nog
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 12:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by nog »

Is uranium forbidden ?
astroshak
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 637
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 9:59 am
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by astroshak »

vanatteveldt wrote: Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:40 pm - you're allowed to use any number of buildings, modules, etc. You can use other items (e.g. heavy oil) as a catalyst, but cannot require a supply.
This would suggest that no, Uranium is not allowed.
Cribbit
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 204
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by Cribbit »

astroshak wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 11:31 am
vanatteveldt wrote: Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:40 pm - you're allowed to use any number of buildings, modules, etc. You can use other items (e.g. heavy oil) as a catalyst, but cannot require a supply.
This would suggest that no, Uranium is not allowed.
- creative mode: you get one matter source of coal, as many water fluid sources as you want
So does this
nog
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 12:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by nog »

Hmm hmm, correct.
User avatar
DaveMcW
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 11:06 am
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by DaveMcW »

DaveMcW wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:14 amBeacon bonus shrinks smoothly as power decreases.
I was wrong, it is possible to save energy and keep the full beacon bonus, if you turn off power when they aren't watching.
viewtopic.php?f=58&t=82236
bobucles
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 10:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by bobucles »

DaveMcW wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:16 am
DaveMcW wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:14 amBeacon bonus shrinks smoothly as power decreases.
I was wrong, it is possible to save energy and keep the full beacon bonus, if you turn off power when they aren't watching.
viewtopic.php?f=58&t=82236
Absolutely devilish. But how do you synchronize the beacon power system with the game UPS clock?
User avatar
DaveMcW
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 11:06 am
Contact:

Re: Challenge: maximum net energy from a blue belt of coal

Post by DaveMcW »

Beacons don't use a global game clock, they have their own clock that starts when they are constructed.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”