Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post all other topics which do not belong to any other category.
Post Reply
Trifonius
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 5:56 pm
Contact:

Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by Trifonius »

I couldn't find a general guide to belt balancers, so I made one myself. It covers all MxN balancers, as well as throughput unlimited balancers.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FsT ... sp=sharing

Feel free to critique it all you like! Any mistakes I made, or techniques I forgot, will be corrected/added.

AngledLuffa
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by AngledLuffa »

Very interesting - a lot to digest.

I believe there are a couple typos. On page 14,

"However, if we were to make a MxN followed by another MxN"

I believe the second one should be NxN, although I might be misunderstanding.

Also, rout -> route

Trifonius
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 5:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by Trifonius »

"However, if we were to make a MxN followed by another MxN"

I believe the second one should be NxN, although I might be misunderstanding.
That doesn't matter here, as we are in the M=N section.

benkor1
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2019 6:32 am
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by benkor1 »

Brilliant work - but I think you've missed something that a lot of people do. Your 4x4 balancer would not work, for reasons shown in this article: https://wiki.factorio.com/Balancer_mechanics.
You actually need 6 balancers to do it correctly.

How this impacts your golden role, I don't know, but I thought I might point this out.

Trifonius
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 5:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by Trifonius »

Brilliant work - but I think you've missed something that a lot of people do. Your 4x4 balancer would not work, for reasons shown in this article: https://wiki.factorio.com/Balancer_mechanics.
You actually need 6 balancers to do it correctly.

How this impacts your golden role, I don't know, but I thought I might point this out.
The mistake is not there. 4 balancers makes a throughput limited 4x4 balancer. As I say in my section on throughput unlimited balancers, this will not suffice if you want optimal throughput under every configuration. The 6 balancers of the standard design are a result of placing 2 throughput limited balancers back-to-back, then cutting out two splitters in the middle, as back-to-back splitters on the same two belts provide no extra value.

netmand
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 302
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 1:20 am
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by netmand »

I like that you decided to put some real thought into sharing your ideas and techniques. I like that there is a guide for such topics. I applaud the time and effort that went into making this. However, It was hard for me to read. The concepts are hard for me to follow, and by page 4 I was like, maybe I should just open up the game and try following along there? Except I don't play with mods, it's a personal choice but I wish a publication that's meant for the general public wouldn't require them to install mods just to follow along with the examples given.

At the beginning there is the observation that balancers are primarily used for loading trains, yet a quick scan of the document yielded not solid examples to follow. Where's a good example of using splitters to efficiently load a train?

You didn't point out any common mistakes and known issues as mentioned by someone above. A section like that would add value to the doc.

Tiffany
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 2:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by Tiffany »

Thank you for the section on compressors! It turns out that's the thing I've been looking for all along. I was mainly looking into this as a way of making sure my mines (with many non-saturated belts) are guaranteed to compress down into the 4 lines that go to train loaders.

Ormek
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:44 am
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by Ormek »

@trifonous I think 0.17 is stable now and you can cut the loop back section in UTU :D

After same pages your speed increased, I would have required more in detailed, stepwise explanations to really follow. But, that is okay. Maybe having a balancer is enough and I can then true to understand how it reallyworks. I loved the initial math and would have liked to see more of it.

I am very, VERY fond of the compressor section. I have the same challenge as @Tiffany and will solve it as described.

vangrunz
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2017 1:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by vangrunz »

Here's my simple 2 lane balancer I've developed, if you have eg. 2 ore fields and you want to support two furnace lines equally:
2023-03-08_101242_cr.png
2023-03-08_101242_cr.png (628.95 KiB) Viewed 10132 times
It did a good job for me. :)

User avatar
disentius
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 694
Joined: Fri May 12, 2017 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by disentius »

there are better solutions, it came up on discord recently:
balanders 2x2.jpg
balanders 2x2.jpg (113.95 KiB) Viewed 10120 times

vangrunz
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2017 1:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by vangrunz »

I guess there're some parts missing

User avatar
Yodo
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2023 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Finding balance: a guide to belt balancers

Post by Yodo »

Kind of a necro, but since this is still linked on the wiki, I would like to point out that the document uses some nonstandard terminology (mainly that TU is called UTU), and has some incorrect claims, at least this one:
The document wrote:One more point: there exists no balancer that is FO, FI and non-UTL simultaneously, other than the splitter itself. If such a balancer were to exist, it could serve as any smaller balancer, but it isn’t that simple, unfortunately.
In standard terminology this says "UTU balancers don't exist", which we know now is clearly untrue. See this Reddit post for a recent example.
Have you considered using flow routers yet?

Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”