- Fixed loading script data when a mod is disabled. (60874)
- Fixed that 0 time interval was shown as an empty string. (60875)
Version 0.16.50
- FactorioBot
- Factorio Staff
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 1:48 pm
Version 0.16.50
Bugfixes
- thecatlover1996
- Long Handed Inserter
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: Version 0.16.50
Let's celebrate for version 0.(2^(2^2)).((10^2)/2) ![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Version 0.16.50
normythecatlover1996 wrote:Let's celebrate for version 0.(2^(2^2)).((10^2)/2)
Re: Version 0.16.50
(2-2).(2^(2^2)).((2+2*2*2)^2)/2
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
- thecatlover1996
- Long Handed Inserter
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: Version 0.16.50
Such a nice and round version numberMerssedes wrote:(2-2).(2^(2^2)).((2+2*2*2)^2)/2
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
(where, as a programmer, "round" is mostly defined as having to do something with the number "2"
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
- taikodragon
- Inserter
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:18 pm
- Contact:
Re: Version 0.16.50
"2" is the loveliest number of them all. All things should come in powers of 2.thecatlover1996 wrote:Such a nice and round version numberMerssedes wrote:(2-2).(2^(2^2)).((2+2*2*2)^2)/2
(where, as a programmer, "round" is mostly defined as having to do something with the number "2")
Re: Version 0.16.50
I'm sure that's the final preparation to 0.17 version
0.16 is the longest versions of factorio - it resembles a polished gemstone![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
0.16 is the longest versions of factorio - it resembles a polished gemstone
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Nickname on ModPortal - Naron79
Re: Version 0.16.50
I agree 1100100 % with that sentiment.taikodragon wrote:"2" is the loveliest number of them all. All things should come in powers of 2.thecatlover1996 wrote:Such a nice and round version numberMerssedes wrote:(2-2).(2^(2^2)).((2+2*2*2)^2)/2
(where, as a programmer, "round" is mostly defined as having to do something with the number "2")
Re: Version 0.16.50
Any chance that this build will be "promoted" as the new 0.16 "stable" ?
There are many fixes over 0.16.36![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
There are many fixes over 0.16.36
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Re: Version 0.16.50
That probably depends on how "stable" it is. If the devs decide there is no need to push a new version to fix other bugs in the next week, then there is a chance they will promote it to stable.
- eradicator
- Smart Inserter
- Posts: 5206
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Version 0.16.50
Only 49 to go until they run out of version numbers and must release 0.17 \o/.
Re: Version 0.16.50
There's nothing wrong with 0.16.101 as far as software versioning goes...eradicator wrote:Only 49 to go until they run out of version numbers and must release 0.17 \o/.
Re: Version 0.16.50
Only 65485 to go until they run out of version numbers and must release 0.17 \o/.icarus86 wrote:There's nothing wrong with 0.16.101 as far as software versioning goes...
Re: Version 0.16.50
0.16.∞DaveMcW wrote:Only 65485 to go until they run out of version numbers and must release 0.17 \o/.icarus86 wrote:There's nothing wrong with 0.16.101 as far as software versioning goes...
Re: Version 0.16.50
They might use 64-bit unsigned integers for the patch level. So only 8e18 version numbers until they switch to arbitrary precision integers or strings. Well, thinking about it - they probably already use strings for the whole version number...DaveMcW wrote:Only 65485 to go until they run out of version numbers and must release 0.17 \o/.
Re: Version 0.16.50
I agree 1101111 %Aeternus wrote:I agree 1100100 % with that sentiment.taikodragon wrote:"2" is the loveliest number of them all. All things should come in powers of 2.thecatlover1996 wrote:Such a nice and round version numberMerssedes wrote:(2-2).(2^(2^2)).((2+2*2*2)^2)/2
(where, as a programmer, "round" is mostly defined as having to do something with the number "2")
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
There are 10 types of people: those who get this joke and those who don't.
Re: Version 0.16.50
Agreed.taikodragon wrote:"2" is the loveliest number of them all. All things should come in powers of 2.thecatlover1996 wrote:Such a nice and round version numberMerssedes wrote:(2-2).(2^(2^2)).((2+2*2*2)^2)/2
(where, as a programmer, "round" is mostly defined as having to do something with the number "2")
1 girl + 1 girl = 2 girls
Re: Version 0.16.50
WOW! That was really a nice calculation. You are looking at everything in the form of binary(2). Are you from Matrix?Merssedes wrote:(2-2).(2^(2^2)).((2+2*2*2)^2)/2
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Version 0.16.50
Wrong assumption leads to wrong answerLiono2010 wrote:WOW! That was really a nice calculation. You are looking at everything in the form of binary(2). Are you from Matrix?Merssedes wrote:(2-2).(2^(2^2)).((2+2*2*2)^2)/2
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Re: Version 0.16.50
I am not sure what does this mean.Merssedes wrote:Wrong assumption leads to wrong answerLiono2010 wrote:WOW! That was really a nice calculation. You are looking at everything in the form of binary(2). Are you from Matrix?Merssedes wrote:(2-2).(2^(2^2)).((2+2*2*2)^2)/2