This is half bug report - half feature request.
When placing items on a belt by inserter, items are generally placed in the front-right corner from the inserter's view. This doesn't hold for inserting on underground belt in or against the belt direction, where it will place on the right in the belt's direction, ignoring the direction of the inserter.
This inconsistency didn't really bother me before the introduction of long-underground-blues, but now that the setup in the picture below is actually viable, it would be a major help in station design.
Notice how only one half of each belt is filled.
[15.16] inserting onto underground inconsistency
Re: [15.16] inserting onto underground inconsistency
If you use long inserters to place items on a belt before the underground you still get the same one sided filling, right?
Or in other words this is not special to underground belts but all belts in general, right?
Or in other words this is not special to underground belts but all belts in general, right?
Re: [15.16] inserting onto underground inconsistency
You're right, didn't even think of that.
In other words, rotating a belt 180° changes an item's placement on that belt differently depending on whether the inserter placing the item is in line with the belt or orthogonal to it.
In other words, rotating a belt 180° changes an item's placement on that belt differently depending on whether the inserter placing the item is in line with the belt or orthogonal to it.
Re: [15.16] inserting onto underground inconsistency
I don't consider this something worth changing. Unless we said in the past it should work some other way and it isn't at best it's a feature request.gustaphe wrote:You're right, didn't even think of that.
In other words, rotating a belt 180° changes an item's placement on that belt differently depending on whether the inserter placing the item is in line with the belt or orthogonal to it.
If you want to get ahold of me I'm almost always on Discord.
Re: [15.16] inserting onto underground inconsistency
When coming from the side an inserter always puts items at the far side. Placement depends on the direction the inserter is facing. This makes sense.Rseding91 wrote:I don't consider this something worth changing. Unless we said in the past it should work some other way and it isn't at best it's a feature request.gustaphe wrote:You're right, didn't even think of that.
In other words, rotating a belt 180° changes an item's placement on that belt differently depending on whether the inserter placing the item is in line with the belt or orthogonal to it.
When going along it always puts it on the right side in the direction of travel of the belt. Now suddenly the inserter knows what direction the belt is moving and decides to behave differently? This makes no sense.
Just saying.