I was thinking, there's some ways to carry fluids to longer distances.
But, sometimes using barrels, trains or create three pipes for transporting three or more liquids together consume a lot of space and work.
If we could transport less fluid of each type, but in a three-in-one pipe ?
A machine similar to Assembler could do the service:
Thank you again!
My best regards.
Triple Pipe
Moderator: ickputzdirwech
Re: Triple Pipe
Strongly against the idea. Unnessessary complication that goes against the game idea of building complex using simple.
- bobingabout
- Smart Inserter
- Posts: 7352
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 1:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: Triple Pipe
1. you can't actually run normal pipes that close together without it all merging into one big pipe blob.
2. I don't really see the benefit of this personally, I mean, wouldn't you just need to split the pipe into 3 again at the other end?
2. I don't really see the benefit of this personally, I mean, wouldn't you just need to split the pipe into 3 again at the other end?
Re: Triple Pipe
I can see it as being useful for long-distance pipelines. Usually I dont bother with oil trains and just run a light oil and oil pipe everywhere along my support rail, to be able to plop down oil wells and flamethrower defense/fuel production anywhere where I expand to. Having a triplepipe , at best a large one, with a larger throughput than the normal one could be useful for my playstyle, although I agree that this seems just like a way to lazily ignore tanker wagons.
Pony/Furfag avatar? Opinion discarded.
Re: Triple Pipe
You're right, the picture shows wrongly the concept.bobingabout wrote:1. you can't actually run normal pipes that close together without it all merging into one big pipe blob.
The pipes should be in other points, or we could have a double pipe instead triple.