Hi there
Is this behaviour a bug or did I just do something wrong?
The highlighted combinator does not output Q even if condition is met.
It work when i change Q to R, but is this new behavior?
Combinator bug or am I stupid?
- Distelzombie
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 4:27 pm
- Contact:
Combinator bug or am I stupid?
- Attachments
-
- 427520_20170514140853_1.png (784.74 KiB) Viewed 2032 times
Complete 2-Lane system as a Blueprint-Book!
The perfect OCD reactor?
Testing chained science lab efficiency
Please use real prefixes and proper rounding!
Re: Combinator bug or am I stupid?
I am not a combinator expert but I think as there is no Q input there is also no Q output. You need either Q input or set output to 1 instead of input count.
Re: Combinator bug or am I stupid?
Or kludge it with an extra arithmatic combinator R+0 = Q, then test for Q>1000 output Q after that.
Re: Combinator bug or am I stupid?
Then better have (R > 1000 | R) -> (R + 0 | Q).Aeternus wrote:Or kludge it with an extra arithmatic combinator R+0 = Q, then test for Q>1000 output Q after that.
- Distelzombie
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 4:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: Combinator bug or am I stupid?
Yeah, I did that. But I always thought this way possible. Hmpf.Dimanper wrote:Then better have (R > 1000 | R) -> (R + 0 | Q).Aeternus wrote:Or kludge it with an extra arithmatic combinator R+0 = Q, then test for Q>1000 output Q after that.
Complete 2-Lane system as a Blueprint-Book!
The perfect OCD reactor?
Testing chained science lab efficiency
Please use real prefixes and proper rounding!