Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
-
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 11:44 am
- Contact:
Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
I just got the tank in a deathworld game and figured I would go roast some bugs.
Although I managed to kill the smallish nests near my base, I was really disappointed that the flamethrower did not actually set things on fire. It does decent damage, but with a hand-held flamethrower biters and nests continue to die from the flames.
Was this intended or is this a bug? If intended, this is quite underwhelming for the 'buffed' thank, and strange that handheld flamethrowers and turrets work fundamentally different from tank flamethrowers...
Although I managed to kill the smallish nests near my base, I was really disappointed that the flamethrower did not actually set things on fire. It does decent damage, but with a hand-held flamethrower biters and nests continue to die from the flames.
Was this intended or is this a bug? If intended, this is quite underwhelming for the 'buffed' thank, and strange that handheld flamethrowers and turrets work fundamentally different from tank flamethrowers...
Last edited by vanatteveldt on Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
It was last minute addition. Intention was to give tank some short range AoE to roast group chasing you or clear your way in a forrest.
We reused flamethrower effect and ammo and called it flamethrower, even though mechanics of it are different. We will change that in future. I am thinking something like "acid cannon"
We reused flamethrower effect and ammo and called it flamethrower, even though mechanics of it are different. We will change that in future. I am thinking something like "acid cannon"
-
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 11:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
Thanks for the clarification.
Is there a reason to not use the full flamethrower effect? Are you afraid that would make it overpowered?
I guess I will have to research the cannon shell upgrades and see how that works .
PS any chance of adding modular armor to vanilla tanks?
Is there a reason to not use the full flamethrower effect? Are you afraid that would make it overpowered?
I guess I will have to research the cannon shell upgrades and see how that works .
PS any chance of adding modular armor to vanilla tanks?
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
Yes, tank is really good now and even though flamethrower is not as powerfull as it was in 0.14, in combination with tank it might be much powerful than anything else on the same technology level.vanatteveldt wrote:Is there a reason to not use the full flamethrower effect? Are you afraid that would make it overpowered?
That's the spiritvanatteveldt wrote:I guess I will have to research the cannon shell upgrades and see how that works .
As far as I know, there is a chance. Well, not modular armor, but enabling equipment grid and adding equipment for vehicles.vanatteveldt wrote:PS any chance of adding modular armor to vanilla tanks?
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
I'm super excited about the acid cannon idea. I just know you're gonna nail the aesthetics! If it's anything like the new pumps this is going to beposila wrote:It was last minute addition. Intention was to give tank some short range AoE to roast group chasing you or clear your way in a forrest.
We reused flamethrower effect and ammo and called it flamethrower, even though mechanics of it are different. We will change that in future. I am thinking something like "acid cannon"
!!!!
If I may add a suggestion about the tank's other visuals (though including any future acid cannons):
Could you add more animations to it like the one you have for pump docking onto tank wagons? What I have in mind is a comparable animation for every vehicle weapon that is played while you are switching to said weapon. For example, while you're switching to the cannon the tank will extract it's telescope chass. Or while switching to the flamethrower / acid cannon a pump like sprayer fed by hoses folds out from behind the tower and brings itself into a position facing your target.
I hope you enjoy making animations
Last edited by Escadin on Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:28 pm, edited 3 times in total.
"--? How are commands compounded in a compounded compound command commanding compound composts." -defines.lua
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
I'm sure wearing and using your own modular armor while driving the tank is still a thing. It wasn't all that great before but they buffed the shit out of discharger and personal laser defense and all these gimmicks should still work while inside the tank.vanatteveldt wrote: PS any chance of adding modular armor to vanilla tanks?
"--? How are commands compounded in a compounded compound command commanding compound composts." -defines.lua
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
It would be just change of flamethrower effect to something else, different icon and different ammo, no extra visuals on the tank itself.Escadin wrote:I'm super excited about the acid cannon idea. I just know you're gonna nail the aesthetics!
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
Just my luckposila wrote:It would be just change of flamethrower effect to something else, different icon and different ammo, no extra visuals on the tank itself.Escadin wrote:I'm super excited about the acid cannon idea. I just know you're gonna nail the aesthetics!
However, you are still planning a HD version, aren't you?
"--? How are commands compounded in a compounded compound command commanding compound composts." -defines.lua
-
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 11:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
That worked pretty well . With all lvl2 upgrades I drive in, use the regular cannon shells to kill the spawners, and then the flamethrower / acid cannon to kill the biters. Of course the tank gets damaged, but in .14 you have to drive circles and hit each spawner three times, now they die immediately, which makes the whole thing a lot more fun . The tank seems indeed quite good at mid level (I see big biters but also still a lot of smaller biters), wondering how it will keep up later.posila wrote:That's the spiritvanatteveldt wrote:I guess I will have to research the cannon shell upgrades and see how that works .
Yeah, that's what I meant. I think it would be really cool to have that on tanks (for shields, mainly) and trains (for roboports). I know it can be modded in, but I like to play vanilla (except for helper mods like creative mode and helmod)posila wrote:As far as I know, there is a chance. Well, not modular armor, but enabling equipment grid and adding equipment for vehicles.vanatteveldt wrote:PS any chance of adding modular armor to vanilla tanks?
Last edited by vanatteveldt on Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
I actually liked the old flamethrower more.. Partly, because the new one requires more skill to aim^^
- StoneLegion
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
So red flame acid ?posila wrote:It would be just change of flamethrower effect to something else, different icon and different ammo, no extra visuals on the tank itself.Escadin wrote:I'm super excited about the acid cannon idea. I just know you're gonna nail the aesthetics!
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
FYI Bob's mods include vehicle equipment, but you might already know that since you said "vanilla tanks".vanatteveldt wrote:PS any chance of adding modular armor to vanilla tanks?
Obuw's Warfare - Combat improvements
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
I tested the new personal laser defense in combination with the tank. It is absolutely INSANE. You should definitely give it a try!
Static discharger is next.
Static discharger is next.
"--? How are commands compounded in a compounded compound command commanding compound composts." -defines.lua
- StoneLegion
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
I love me some discharge!Escadin wrote:I tested the new personal laser defense in combination with the tank. It is absolutely INSANE. You should definitely give it a try!
Static discharger is next.
-
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 11:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
Escadin wrote:I tested the new personal laser defense in combination with the tank. It is absolutely INSANE. You should definitely give it a try!
Static discharger is next.
Excellent. I had somehow assumed that the personal modular stuff wouldn't work (although I knew that the personal roboport works from within a train, so no idea why I thought that).
(Researching portable fusion as we speak, but my god science is expensive on marathon! The fusion power tech alone costs over 230k copper and 160k iron.... and 85% of the copper is in the hi-tech packs... time to open some more copper mines!)
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
I wholeheartedly disagree with this whole acid gun idea.posila wrote:It was last minute addition. Intention was to give tank some short range AoE to roast group chasing you or clear your way in a forrest.
We reused flamethrower effect and ammo and called it flamethrower, even though mechanics of it are different. We will change that in future. I am thinking something like "acid cannon"
It's a waste of design time and prevents using the ONE thing that is ideal for clearing biter bases!
Seriously, please just make it a flamethrower, like the handheld one and give it a bit more range, like the tank based smg!
- Distelzombie
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 4:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
Hm... Acid would also have an effect over time. Make it a flechette gun. 'Those things exist irl. I'd like thatposila wrote:It was last minute addition. Intention was to give tank some short range AoE to roast group chasing you or clear your way in a forrest.
We reused flamethrower effect and ammo and called it flamethrower, even though mechanics of it are different. We will change that in future. I am thinking something like "acid cannon"
Complete 2-Lane system as a Blueprint-Book!
The perfect OCD reactor?
Testing chained science lab efficiency
Please use real prefixes and proper rounding!
-
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 11:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
If the flamethrower is not on the table I would go with poison gas, although the effect would have to be more immediate than the current capsules. Even better, use the capsules as ammo but have a 'nerve gas' capsule that has the same AoE but more immediate damage and/or temporary incapacitation. That way it would be a good 'crowd control' weapon but not be OP against bases, which is what the main gun seems to be defined for.
Re: Tank flamethrower - why doesn't it set things on fire?
I agree with the above. Seriously, please, at least leave an option to choose between the flamethrower and the acid spray.wwdragon wrote:I wholeheartedly disagree with this whole acid gun idea.posila wrote:It was last minute addition. Intention was to give tank some short range AoE to roast group chasing you or clear your way in a forrest.
We reused flamethrower effect and ammo and called it flamethrower, even though mechanics of it are different. We will change that in future. I am thinking something like "acid cannon"
It's a waste of design time and prevents using the ONE thing that is ideal for clearing biter bases!
Seriously, please just make it a flamethrower, like the handheld one and give it a bit more range, like the tank based smg!
First off, shooting stream of fire really fits the tank. Together with the cannon and the MG it really works well with the aesthetics and the feel of an armored, tracked battle vehicle and its gritty dieselpunk technology. Shooting acid doesn't really fit the picture.
Furthermore, having both handheld flamer and the tank secondary weapon use the same ammo raises the value of the item and makes it much more worthwhile to build production line of napalm cans. If the tank at one point won't use it anymore, I'll have doubts if I I'll even bother making a dedicated flamer ammo assembly, since I rarely use the handheld flamer as a main gun anyway (my main weapon of choice is rocket launcher).