I suggest we rename the splitter to mixer, seeing as it functions more like an additive mixer than a splitter, giving two outputs with a combination of both inputs.
What would be really awesome is the ability to click the mixer and change it's function, so that it can act as a mixer (as it does now), or in some other mode like a crossover (alternating putting track A on B and B on A), etc.
Here's why I would call this more of a mixer...
Rename Splitter to Mixer
Moderator: ickputzdirwech
-
- Inserter
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:34 pm
- Contact:
- bobingabout
- Smart Inserter
- Posts: 7352
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 1:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rename Splitter to Mixer
It's a multifunction device, if it was named mixer, some people might not realise it can be used to split the belt traffic.
Coming up with a good name that describes most possible functions isn't as easy as it sounds.
Coming up with a good name that describes most possible functions isn't as easy as it sounds.