![Image](https://forums.factorio.com/images/ext/11afcc3106b20434aa22124ec4e48918.png)
Probably not the most efficient, but pretty good.
and most probably not automatedIncinirate wrote:Probably not the most efficient
Wow, that's very space efficient. And you even make the steel inside the module... LOL. The only things coming from the outside seem to be sulfuric acid and plastic bars. Why not make these in-place as well?Leon wrote:this is the best automated 4x science pack setup
True, but finding inspiration is always goodKoub wrote:The nicest setup is not the one you borrow, but the one you give birth to all by yourself
Leon wrote:this is the best automated 4x science pack setup
4x science pack
mother of god that is niceLeon wrote:this is the best automated 4x science pack setup
Indeed - it's stunningLazyLoneLion wrote:I like this setup more
Because it's shorter, it has bigger performance (you can add another 10 labs too) and it's balanced.
And it blows my mind too
I like this a lot, but it needs fixing in a few places for current Factorio because the build still uses the trick to grab off the end of a belt without the belt actually running that far. In a few spots this is not merely for looks, so the build won't work like this without fixing.LazyLoneLion wrote:Because it's shorter, it has bigger performance (you can add another 10 labs too) and it's balanced.
And it blows my mind too
Sure. But those fixes are just obvious.siggboy wrote:I like this a lot, but it needs fixing in a few places for current Factorio because the build still uses the trick to grab off the end of a belt without the belt actually running that far.
One per assembler is enough unless you use Assembly Machine 3 and/or speed modules.LazyLoneLion wrote:2) there should be one more inserter for feeding every copper wire assembler. I have one per assembler, and there should be two per assembler.
Seems so.siggboy wrote:One per assembler is enough unless you use Assembly Machine 3 and/or speed modules.
A Fast Inserter is more than fast enough to feed a blue Assembly Machine with copper plates, even if the cycle time is only 0.5 seconds.
What problem do you have in mind there?siggboy wrote:What's sad about it is that the space saving does not actually solve a problem. It only looks cool and well engineered.