A 6:84:60 steam powerplant (mainly) just for fun

Post pictures and videos of your factories.
If possible, please post also the blueprints/maps of your creations!
For art/design etc. you can go to Fan Art.

Post Reply
BlakeMW
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
Contact:

A 6:84:60 steam powerplant (mainly) just for fun

Post by BlakeMW »

I was interested to see how many boilers and steam engines I could join together on a single water network and have it work at 100%, apparently there is no real limit as long as you provide enough parallel paths for the water to go and ensure that the water from each offshore pump goes through 14 boilers.

Image

User avatar
DaveMcW
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 3705
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 11:06 am
Contact:

Re: A 6:84:60 steam powerplant (mainly) just for fun

Post by DaveMcW »

Do you get the full 30.6 MW? It looks like the right side is bottlenecked on hot water.

BlakeMW
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
Contact:

Re: A 6:84:60 steam powerplant (mainly) just for fun

Post by BlakeMW »

DaveMcW wrote:Do you get the full 30.6 MW? It looks like the right side is bottlenecked on hot water.
The power plant is linked to a radar array which completely maxes it out, you can see all 84 boilers are indeed operating - I don't think it's even possible for the boilers to all be operating and the steam engines not as if some steam engines aren't consuming liquid the flow rate through the boilers would be reduced, but in any case all steam engines are indeed operating at full performance and the production is 30.6MW.

Now as for why it's not bottlenecked - the bottom two boiler strings run the middle steam engines, the middle two boiler strings run the right engines, and the top two boiler strings run the left engines - more or less. The fluid simulation is good enough to let the water find a way.

There's a variant I want to post: Those with delicate sensibilities around fluid dynamic theories may want to avert their eyes ;):

Image

Once again under full sustained load we have all boilers operating at nominal capacity, it does take about 30s for the fluid simulation to stabilize but once it does it produces the full 30.6MW. As can be seen, parallel pipes actually work completely fine, there's another guy who has posted some things about this. If the pipes have enough capacity, the fluid simulation will find a way. The only thing which will make it not work is to give the water from the offshore pumps multiple possible paths through the boilers, if you joined the output from the offshore pumps together, most the water go through one or two of the boiler strings, bypassing the other strings almost altogether, avoid that one caveat and you can have fun with monstrously parallel pipeage.

User avatar
Kewlhotrod
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:20 pm
Contact:

Re: A 6:84:60 steam powerplant (mainly) just for fun

Post by Kewlhotrod »

its not worth the inconsistency the build like that

BlakeMW
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
Contact:

Re: A 6:84:60 steam powerplant (mainly) just for fun

Post by BlakeMW »

It's obviously not a serious design - but I think in future I'll be exploiting parallel pipes for steam setups with 40 or 50 steam engines, it only starts to look silly with 60 or 70 steam engines.

Fatmice
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 808
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:03 pm
Contact:

Re: A 6:84:60 steam powerplant (mainly) just for fun

Post by Fatmice »

If you want less delay you should have the steam engines below the boilers.
Maintainer and developer of Atomic Power. See here for more information.
Current release: 0.6.6 - Requires 0.14.x
Example build - Requires 0.14.x

Post Reply

Return to “Show your Creations”