The obsolete turret problem

Place to discuss the game balance, recipes, health, enemies mining etc.
Poynting Vector
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:20 pm
Contact:

The obsolete turret problem

Post by Poynting Vector »

I've got problem with the balancing of turrets.

In my opinion laser turrets are much better than regular turrets as they kill small and big biters faster.
So once I get my laser turrets the regular turrets become obsolete, I understand that laser turrets require a lot of power, yet with a handful of accumulators this problem is fixed.

That is why I think it is a good idea the change the laser turret from firing a series of small lasers to one big burst.
This burst would have the same DPS as the turret has now, but as it can only hit one enemy it would be far less effective against multiple small biters.
If possible it would be useful to have it prioritize bigger biters over smaller ones to get the maximum effectiveness out of it (and to avoid frustration).

Just and idea to make the regular turrets useful in later stages of the game, let me know what you think.
Koub
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 7778
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:54 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Koub »

Actually, regular turrets with piercing ammo, once as much upgraded as lasers, does a nice amount of carnage.
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
vanatteveldt
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 947
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 11:44 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by vanatteveldt »

I like your suggestion, I think that the direction should be towards making "mixed defense" (i.e. gun+lasers+minefields in various configurations) the optimum, rather than the current mindless laser turret spam.

I think that indeed the DPS of regular turrets is even a bit higher than lasers, especially because the bullet and turret damage upgrades stack. However, the difference is small enough to make it not really matter, enough laser turrets kill everything nicely (at least until behemoths), assuming that there is a large enough DMZ.

So, I think the trade-off is mostly that the logistics for lasers are so much easier (literally plug and play :)) that relying on mostly gun turrets is quite a lot of extra work. Gun turrets do have the advantage that they will continue functioning if you run out of electricity, I've had to reload quite a few factories due to a no coal-no electricity-no miners/inserters spiral that allowed the biters to overrun the defenses. Using guns or mixing lasers/guns in the main base is usually quite doable logistically, but transporting bullets to outposts is a whole extra level of pain nice automation challenge.
User avatar
bobingabout
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 7352
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by bobingabout »

Koub wrote:Actually, regular turrets with piercing ammo, once as much upgraded as lasers, does a nice amount of carnage.
And if you use my mod ammo, they become godlike.
Creator of Bob's mods. Expanding your gameplay since version 0.9.8.
I also have a Patreon.
User avatar
Jackalope_Gaming
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 230
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:11 pm
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Jackalope_Gaming »

A note about biters is they have physical resistance but not laser resist. Behemoth biters have 20% physical resistance.
Koub
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 7778
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:54 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Koub »

Gun turrets benefit from turret upgrades AND ammo upgrades.
Laser turrets benefit only from turrets upgrade.

One fully upgraded laser shot from laser turret makes 11 damage
One fully upgraded piercing shot from a gun turret makes 24.2 damage
24.2 damage is more than 11 - even mitigated by 20% (19.36 mitigated)

And ... have I talked about firing speed ? :)

Laser turrets have the advantage of easiness : plop a bunch of them, add power poles, and you're done. Gun turrets must be reloaded, so you need some logistics to provide them magazines and reload them.
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
Nasabot
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:16 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Nasabot »

Koub wrote:Gun turrets benefit from turret upgrades AND ammo upgrades.
Laser turrets benefit only from turrets upgrade.

One fully upgraded laser shot from laser turret makes 11 damage
One fully upgraded piercing shot from a gun turret makes 24.2 damage
24.2 damage is more than 11 - even mitigated by 20% (19.36 mitigated)

And ... have I talked about firing speed ? :)

Laser turrets have the advantage of easiness : plop a bunch of them, add power poles, and you're done. Gun turrets must be reloaded, so you need some logistics to provide them magazines and reload them.
Yes, thats true, but still gun torrets become obsolete.

1. because they have only 400 HP
2. lower range
3. energy is infinte and therefore has no value

Even if gun turrets did 10x as much damage as laser turrets, gun torrets would still become obsolete. Its not possible to balance it, because it has an intrinsic broken mechanic. (An analogy is that it does not make a difference if you devide 10 or 500 by zero... As long as you devide by zero, its broken^^)

I solved this balance issue with my "Vanilla Plus" Mod:
viewtopic.php?f=95&t=20479

In my mod both turrets are useful.
Gun turret balance is oriented at laser turrets viability.

Mod change:
Gun turret: more tanky,(same HP as laser turrets but additional resistances to make gun turret with its lower range a "frontline" building), lower range, slightly higher damage DPS than Laser turret, consumes ammo
Laser turret: higher range and consumes a lot more energy(5MJ instead of 0,8MJ per Shot) in a mod where energy is not infinte(but plenty) anymore
Gladaed
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 4:55 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Gladaed »

Also note that the Gun Turret damage is instant !
When encountering large waves LASER lose their effectiveness due to enormous flight times
_aD
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:03 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by _aD »

I used to ditch gun turrets ASAP, but now they get put down in pairs with lasers. They help provide extra damage with no power cost, act as a backup if the power does go out (which inevitably happens miles away, when it does) and running ammo isn't a big deal, as I always run supply trains anyway.
User avatar
ssilk
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 12889
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:35 pm
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by ssilk »

I think this suggestion and that: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=20073 Actual laser turret
could be combined.
Cool suggestion: Eatable MOUSE-pointers.
Have you used the Advanced Search today?
Need help, question? FAQ - Wiki - Forum help
I still like small signatures...
Poynting Vector
Manual Inserter
Manual Inserter
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:20 pm
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Poynting Vector »

ssilk wrote:I think this suggestion and that: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=20073 Actual laser turret
could be combined.
That was exactly what I was thinking of.
Marconos
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:46 pm
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Marconos »

The entire premise of the main post is wrong.

I only use Gun turrets in my bases and I play on max biter settings. The same number of gun turrets can take out large packs of aliens better than the same number of laser turrets. Guns do require ammo but I find them great at keeping my base clear and I have found nothing that they can't hold up to.

Gun do more damage faster than lasers, as has been pointed out. The only downside is the ammo but that's what your base is for, might as well have it make something. Gun turrets are never obsolete and are great early, mid and late game. Best part about them, in any stage of the game, plop down a turret slap in some ammo and you are good to go. Base runs out of power for whatever reason, guns are still running. Just a great tool in the arsenal.

For the best defense you would want Gun turrets backed up by laser turrets. This would give you covering fields of fire and give you the best of both worlds (with the lasers longer range they can shoot over the gun turrets. In reality though, the laser and gun turrets are so powerful either type has no real issues taking care of any standard game alien menace.
malecord
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:23 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by malecord »

Gun turrets are almost ok. Once fully upgrade they do like 4 times the damage of laser turrets. So the short range is very much compensated by the righteous death that they deliver.

Their only problems are:
1) they don't connect to logistic network: so you always have to setup a requester chest and an inserter. This is something devs are going to fix so it won't bother us for long.
2) their health doesn't scale so they are blown up very fast late game. You may want to place them behind laser turrets, but then they will have hard time reaching spitters.

I think that the devs could add an armored gun turret recipe that uses a regular turret plus steel. Same damage/range but better resistance.
Koub
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 7778
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:54 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Koub »

malecord wrote:2) their health doesn't scale so they are blown up very fast late game.
That's what walls are made for :)
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
Lallante
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:48 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Lallante »

Koub wrote:
malecord wrote:2) their health doesn't scale so they are blown up very fast late game.
That's what walls are made for :)
Wall doesnt work vs spitters.

50% shorter range than lasers is what makes turrets obsolete. Nothing less, nothing more.
silenced
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by silenced »

Lallante wrote:50% shorter range than lasers is what makes turrets obsolete. Nothing less, nothing more.
No, not at all. A combination of both is nice. Gun Turrets front, Laser Turrets right behind, and no matter what big waves are coming -> short work, without lasers getting in trouble due to low firing speed.

Of course, you can do a triple-row of lasers, for maximum overkill, THEN gun turrets become obsolete.


In the end, of course, it's more resource-friendly to use lasers, even if you need a huge amount of accumulators.
ArchJudge
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by ArchJudge »

Maybe it will help if there is added a new mid-late game tech with hefty science cost, call it Advanced Combat Turret Research and it unlocks two recipes.

One for concrete reinforcing that you can build over your existing gun turret(s) (+4 Concrete + 1 Steel as extra production costs - restricted only to gun turrets) that doesn't add HP but it adds Acid Resistance (+5 maybe? +7? even more?)

And one that unlocks APFSDS ammo (Armor Piercing Fin-Stabilized Discarding-Sabot) (that uses existing AP Magazines + 1 Iron Plating as production cost with a blue color coding) that doesn't add to the turret physical DPS (or even decreases it a bit) but it does increase its range to make it relevant vs laser turret defenses (+10 range?)
I love the smell of concrete paving robots in the morning .... it smells like Factorio
Linux_user404
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2016 3:37 pm
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Linux_user404 »

silenced wrote:
Lallante wrote:50% shorter range than lasers is what makes turrets obsolete. Nothing less, nothing more.
No, not at all. A combination of both is nice. Gun Turrets front, Laser Turrets right behind, and no matter what big waves are coming -> short work, without lasers getting in trouble due to low firing speed.

Of course, you can do a triple-row of lasers, for maximum overkill, THEN gun turrets become obsolete.


In the end, of course, it's more resource-friendly to use lasers, even if you need a huge amount of accumulators.
Well, I am not sure if I can defend my base in the late game... I have thick walls and 4 rows(the 4-th is not continuous due to placement of electric substations) of laser turrets behind them. Everything damage/speed related is fully upgraded. Those continuous waves of behemoth spitters and biters manage to destroy my turrets from time to time. I would gladly replace some of my lasers by gun turrets if they would hold them...
Pissed behemoths...
Pissed behemoths...
screebshot14.png (450.98 KiB) Viewed 11431 times
Turrets eat power!!!
Turrets eat power!!!
screebshot16.png (972.73 KiB) Viewed 11431 times
Koub
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 7778
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:54 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by Koub »

You should destroy the biggest nests biters have created in your pollution cloud. it would make things a LOT easier for your turrets.
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
StarFox31
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 11:02 am
Contact:

Re: The obsolete turret problem

Post by StarFox31 »

Koub wrote:You should destroy the biggest nests biters have created in your pollution cloud. it would make things a LOT easier for your turrets.
Agreed. In my first game we kept getting hit about 2 -3 times per day cycle. We went around in tanks and killed everything. Not a single attack after that.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Balancing”