I suppose this request shouldn't have been a separate thread: viewtopic.php?t=129837

In Cerys, higher-quality towers have a larger heating range.

For the player-constructible towers that the player can hold in their cursor, the current value of radius_visualisation_specification.distance is 15, which matches their actual heating range at Normal quality.

It would be fantastic for ...

I appreciate that most of these entries are not capped at 1, because that would break the already working property for the Inverted Quality mod.


How is that? So far a QualityPrototype::level is uint32, which means a default_multiplier = `1 + 0.3 * level` was never able to go below value of 1 ...

I appreciate that most of these entries are not capped at 1, because that would break the already working property for the Inverted Quality mod.

+1

If you already have certain mandatory dependencies of a modpack installed, then installing the modpack won’t check those dependencies and thus the client will error when the user restarts.

Several fields show as 'None' while the modlist is being fetched for a multiplayer game, notably including the modlist. This should presumably be blank or 'Loading...'.

This applies to all servers so is easy to reproduce.

Yes required_when_disabled would be even better, that would not be a breaking change.

Another ref: https://mods.factorio.com/mod/SolarSyst ... e1fb878bf5

As of the latest release (2.0.52), if a prerequisite LuaTechnology has enabled=false, it still blocks its successors unless researched=true. Such prerequisites are normally hidden from the player.

For modders who at runtime want to disable a technology and prevent it blocking successors such that ...

One example where this would have been handy: https://mods.factorio.com/mod/Small-Spa ... 0910f780d4

I often wish to highly recommend a dependency by making it download by default, but not mandatory so that players are able to opt-out.

The current workaround is to make the mod mandatory, but add a 'Disable mod' checkbox to the dependency. A number of my mods have this checkbox and the drawback is ...

I've realized the real cause of this issue: Inverted Quality flips the sign of the effect of the quality effect of quality modules.

It makes sense that the engine would react by making that quality effect immune to quality, so this is not a bug.

I reproducibly obtained this effect when the GUI (Factoriopedia) is opened _by_ the chat click.

However, I can no longer reproduce this on 2.0.48.

Thanks.

Attached is the mod Planet-Hoppers 3.0.0 since I have just removed that release from the Portal.

Two bugs with launch_rocket are observed in the mod https://mods.factorio.com/mod/Planet-Hopper:

* In the attached save, launch_rocket fails to launch the player and returns false. The documentation is not exactly clear on when false will be obtained, but the player is standing near the rocket and ...

My interest was in the design of Factorio rather than how the engine implements that design. However thanks for confirming OP is not a bug (by which I mean a mistake in the implementation of the design).

It is interesting that it is a single exception among all (non-furnace, non-recycling) recipes ...

For the public record, this triggered discussions in the Factorio discord to which I will link instead of summarize: https://discord.com/channels/1396775903 ... 4754672830

Productivity modules claim to only work when producing intermediates, but this recipe seems to be the one exception in the game (excluding science packs and fluoroketone cooling for reasons.)

Actually, contra what is implied by the mod description all quality levels in that mod are positive. They all get +5 levels from what is listed, and the corresponding prototype properties are nerfed.

The bug is that a level=1 quality module and a level=3 quality module can have equal effects. This ...