Any mod to revert this change?


As an alternative to a mod you can use /c game.player.insert("infinity-chest") and configure it to void items.


Am I misunderstanding this reply, or is the "solution" that's being suggested here for people to use a cheat instead of previously valid gameplay ...

You're trolling at this point. No-one is forced to do it, and no-one who does it is complaining about it ruining their fun.

Whelp, I tried to be charitable. but at the end of the day you just don't care about other people.


WTF... that is the most completely surreal hot take.

You complain ...

I would like to know which scenario it was even possible to have the splitters cause issues with that. Because the whole "put on the input side of splitters" thing only ever applied to splitters facing towards or away from the Inserter, both of which being cases that were quite literally unusable ...

Ummm.... the thing with inserters dropping to the input side of splitters by default is a breaking change.

Inserter lane flipping is super cool, and will enable cleaner builds for belt enthusiasts. I like this a lot. Most importantly, when loading existing saves, it can default the target lane to ...

I really wish all circuit connection parameters had the little R and G buttons like Combinators do


Agree. That would be so nice for inserters too, comparing the red signal to the green signal in the condition for the inserter. Seems like low hanging fruit.


I can't see any universe in which ...

Capping it at 10 makes it a non-infinite research so it will be required for the research all tech achievement.


This didn't seem to be a problem for Weapon Shooting Speed research; we have to research all 6 levels of that tech for the achievement.

I get why the suggested change would be ...

vjbone wrote: Tue May 20, 2025 11:13 am pls include wagons in your bp, its hard to find place available

I updated the blueprint with the cargo wagons included.

I thought they removed this in 2.0... it took a lot of searching to realize you have to hold down shift while capturing the blueprint for it to include trains.

Here's a version meant for large scale production. It's only 22 circuits per second instead of 28, but at a lower UPS cost due to the following optimizations:


Cursed design abusing cargo wagons, to eliminate all internal belts and minimize the number of inserters. This doubles as the buffer ...

The proposed change would make the amount of science you get from an agricultural science pack deterministic.

Let's say I'm trying to make 1000 SPM of all sciences. With the current state of the game, I first have to figure out roughly how spoiled my agricultural science will be once it gets to the ...

I take it this is the case even if they're on different surfaces due to scripting?


Well, in the case I linked above, that was in the sandbox with a completely empty nauvis, no other planets, and just the one space platform. Having it be multithreaded per surface would probably be an easy change ...

TLDR: The spoil timer for agricultural science should be much shorter, but in exchange the science value should not decrease over time.

It's cool you guys tried to do something different here, but it's not fun. The spoilage aspect is fine, but the fact that agricultural science packs have ...

It would be great to have an infinite research that scale like research productivity and that adds +10% promethium science productivity per level.

Funny, I was actually thinking the same thing yesterday. But then I realized they'd have to cap it at 300% like everything else, and promethium ...

Thanks for the report however there is nothing to do with this.

It would be great if this could get added to the list of potential performance optimizations for 2.1. Right now promethium science is far and away the biggest bottleneck for megabases. Giving turret and asteroid collector updates the ...

Because it kind of reminds me of a sea anemone.


SpaceAnemone.gif


0eNrtneFy2jgUhd/Fv6EjXUm2yavs7OyQ4KSeGps1ptNMJ+++hgaSEAy6/ui2O5tfnSbSOfI958iyL7Tfk9tqU6zasu6Sm+9JedfU6+Tmj+/Junyo59X2Z/V8WSQ3STsvq4dNPe02bVt0yST5ezOvyu6x/1VVPBT1Yt4+Jk+TpKwXxbfkxj5NToDM113RNuVietdUVXHXNe1FIHn6c5IUdVd2ZfFjabu ...

Luckily, if you don't like any of these new modes of playing, there's still good ol' 2.0 that you can play to your heart's content!


FWIW this kind of comes across like, "you can just go back to the old game and ignore the money you spent on Space Age if you don't like it." Not sure if that's ...

My endgame transport ship:

SmallTransport.jpg

0eNrtXduO4ziS/Rc/7toNBUndCjPzuB+wAyx60CgYSluZKZQt5chSddc08gPmL/Zh58fmS5bUxZZtUSJ1fMmq9kuVrBRDFBk8DAbjBH+fPW3K+C1P0mL26fdZssrS3ezTL7/PdslLGm3UvTTaxrNPs+I1L3dFnM/ms7+X0SYpvsmbm/glTtdR/m32Pp8l6Tr+bfaJ3uc9xXdv0SpevG2i4jnLt4vX8qlThL1/ns/itEiKJK5fX ...

You're right that Nauvis -> Vulcanis -> Fulgora -> Gleba is the clearly intended progression if you want the least amount of friction. But this kind of speaks to my point.

The original game didn't prescribe a super clear path through the tech tree, and in general it didn't actively punish you for ...

I will 1000% agree with your first point. And I don’t think you’ll find too many people defending that one either. I totally get the “messy tangled organic mess” vibe the devs were aiming for, and I guess to their credit they achieved that. But it’s also a masterclass in un-usability and visual ...

Okay, I understand then, if the point is to make use of a waste product.

I'm not convinced it's worth the extra effort, and there are automated ways to void fluids. But I can appreciate the challenge of a "zero waste" factory.

What is the goal here? Is it to figure out the best ways to abuse only the foundry's prod bonus? Or to get the most legendary plates per minute?

A single upcycled metallic asteroid chunk will net you (with full crusher prod bonuses) 120 legendary plates after smelting the ore. I'm pretty sure ...